Anti-Bullying Bill Passes State Senate, Draws Criticism
State Democrats and the father of the victim after whom the bill was named have denounced the bill because of the exception for religious beliefs or moral convictions. One senator gave an impassioned speech against the bill. What do you think?
The state Senate yesterday passed a new bill that would require school districts to implement anti-bullying policies. But the bill is drawing criticism from Democrats and the father of the victim after whom the bill was named.
The critics say the bill creates a special exception for bullies who have "a sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction," as well as neglecting to protect against bullying by students based on sexual orientation or gender identity, according to a story by the Huffington Post.
Known as Matt's Safe School Law, the bill effectively bans harassment in schools and requires every district to have an anti-bullying policy. The law was inspired by Matt Epling, a Michigan teen who committed suicide shortly after an anti-gay hazing incident.
One Michigan Democrat, Sen. Gretchen Whitmer, D-East Lansing, gave a speech harshly criticizing the passage of the bill, saying it creates a blueprint for bullying rather than preventing it.
"You may be able to pat yourselves on the back today and say that you did something, but in actuality you are explicitly outlining how to get away with bullying," said Senator Gretchen Whitmer. "As passed today, bullying kids is okay if a student, parent, teacher or school employee can come up with a moral or religious reason for doing it."
Matt Epling's father, Kevin Epling, was quoted in the Detroit Free Press as saying of the bill, "This is just unconscionable. This is government-sanctioned bigotry."
GOP proponents, however, said the billl is on the right track to protect Michigan kids. Sen. Rick Jones, R-Grand Ledge, the bill's sponsor, said the intent of the bill is to get each district to write an anti-bullying policy within six months, according to The Detroit News.
One commenter on the Trenton Facebook page, Jema McCardell said: "Bullying is wrong, period. But I wonder if the wording was added to avoid simple statement of one's beliefs such as "I believe that homosexuality is against the will of God" to be prosecutable. To me, that is not bullying. USING that belief to harass someone, that is bullying and completely against the teachings of Christ."
What do you think of the bill as it was passed by the state Senate? Should lawmakers go further to outline specifics to protect kids from bullying in school, or does the legislation do enough as it is? Should a religious belief or moral conviction be an exception to bullying?
Jenny Whalen
4:11 pm on Thursday, November 3, 2011
Kevin Epling visited Macomb Township a few months ago to talk about Matt and his hope for anti-bullying legislation. Check it out: http://macomb.patch.com/articles/dakota-asks-students-to-speak-out-against-bullying
Rick Fink
11:23 pm on Thursday, November 3, 2011
Cry me a river! When I grew up, I was bullied and survived. Bullies have been around since the beginning of time and will always be here. Matt chose to commit suicide and because of his decision the state is passing more "feel good" laws, the last thing we need. It must be an election year.
Jewelz4USA
11:51 pm on Thursday, November 3, 2011
First, I don't buy your "I was bullied and survived". Anybody who has been truly bullied would NOT want anyone else to go through the same. We aren't just talking someone "picking" on another kid. This goes on day-in and day-out. Kids get isolated from the rest because of a single or group of people...the followers too timid to stand up to the people as well. And with the likes of Facebook and other social websites, you see this going to a whole new level. For some kids there is no "safety" such as it used to be...you left school and were ok. "Feel good laws"? Like it or not, nobody has the right to push others around. Maybe you've heard of assault, slander or maybe even harassment. School is intended for LEARNING and although this law is completely flawed, its time that school be a safe place.
Erin Maday
8:16 am on Friday, November 4, 2011
I completely agree that this law is flawed, however, the foundation for which it was proposed is absolutely needed. It is clear, through your comments you suggest that people/society just "accept" something that infringes on all children's right to learn in a safe place. It is true that bullying has reached a whole new level with the addition of technology, and is becoming something that victims of bullying might not be able to get away from after school days end. In today's world we are told to "deal" with so much, and just "accept it", whether it's a small inconvenience or a major life-changing event. Well, we need to reconnect as civilized people, living in a community and work together to make things change for the better. Besides, you never know - these types of anti-bullying policies may even help children doing the bullying, since research shows those children are likely victims at home, or have been victimized verbally/physically themselves. Prevention is the best policy. Steps like this help stop the cycle of creating bullies and victims over and over. If we do not have policies like this, then more children's cries for help will go unnoticed, and therefore fuel our already apathetic society that seems to be growing into a more violent and dehumanized society. If you're not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
ConcernedParent
12:06 pm on Friday, November 4, 2011
I have to say, Rick that your comments rather contradict your statement that you 'survived.' You sound bitter and twisted as a result of your experiences. I suggest you do some reading on the number of suicides that have occurred as a result of bullying. Read the stories, and if you still see no need for this bill, then you simply have no soul. I would rather we do everything we can to protect our children from abuse in our schools.
HTD
6:49 am on Friday, November 4, 2011
"As passed today, bullying kids is okay if a student, parent, teacher or school employee can come up with a moral or religious reason for doing it."
Please, Ms. Janice Monarrez, be more specific in what kind of bullying exclusions are supposed to be allowed and please name the group that pushed for this exclusion. It appears that some lame lobbying group is trying to take the teeth out of this bill.
Bullying is bullying, even if it is part of an initiation right. We must protect the weak from their oppressors.
Jessica Carreras
10:18 am on Friday, November 4, 2011
You might be interested in reading the full text of SB 137, available on legislature.gov: http://legislature.mi.gov/%28S%28m0cyu055ptyzww3ijrq5cc45%29%29/mileg.aspx?page=getobject&objectname=2011-SB-0137&query=on
Patch Possum
7:06 am on Friday, November 4, 2011
I'll be disappointed in Gov. Snyder if he passes this bill, as amended, which is too nebulous to be good legislation.
Jessica Carreras
10:15 am on Friday, November 4, 2011
This story about the reaction from state Superintendent Mike Flanagan might provide some insight into the Snyder administration's views on the bill: http://www.freep.com/article/20111103/NEWS15/111103050/State-education-chief-blasts-anti-bullying-bill-joke-
Given this, do you think he's likely to pass it?
Bob Carr
8:50 am on Friday, November 4, 2011
So bullying is okay if it expresses a "sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction." I am left wondering precisely which religions and which moral convictions promote persecution. Although the advocates of these legal exemptions are the same who usually proclaim Islam to be the nexus of intolerance, I expect that these acolytes of violence under the excuse of "sincerely held religious belief" claim more mainstream faith. These Republicans other times argue that Affirmative Action is to be resisted so that individuals may be treated equally, but devalue their principles when they insist that religious or moral bullies deserve special protection.
Exemptions are anyway probably not needed to protect these special needs bullies or their sponsors. Rather, they can say their prayers and then sleep comfortably and safe in their beds. This is because the measure does not require school districts to report bullying incidents, provide for enforcement, require teacher training, or hold administrators accountable if they fail to act.
But there is good new in this bill. Presumably, if one is a bully whose "sincerely held religious beliefs or moral convictions" require one to bully those who bully because of "sincerely held religious beliefs or moral convictions," then these protections also apply. Perhaps two wrongs may indeed make a right!
dina polakiewicz
10:07 am on Friday, November 4, 2011
the bill does not go far enough. It needs to be stronger all of our children need to be protected.
ConcernedParent
12:09 pm on Friday, November 4, 2011
I suggest everyone read the story about the recent 'hazing' in Walled Lake if they don't think this kind of legislation is essential. What horrifies me is the community coming out on the side of the Coach in whose house the incident took place. It seems that as long as your strongly held belief is football, you can bully and physically abuse kids any way you like in our schools. Horrific.
Dimples
5:01 pm on Friday, November 4, 2011
By saying "Homosexually is against the Bible" THAT IS NOT BULLYING. THAT IS A FACT. Bullying is purposely hurting or harrassing another. We, as Christians, are not to do that. We threat everyone with respect, but that does not mean we do not have an opinion. That is the difference! Everything has gone to far. I even heard on TV a really old saying when someone wants something back, he is called an "Indian giver". It was said those two words offended so many people. I really doubt it. It was just an old saying and it doesn't mean anything. People are just too thin skinned today and offended by every little thing. If we get stricker and stricker laws then WATCH OUT as you could end up with a "crime" for the smallest thing. But yes, we should not BULLY. That is totally different.
Mermaid Luna
5:48 am on Saturday, November 5, 2011
All forms, for any reason, bullying hurts. It maims your heart, puts doubt & sorrow in your soul. I've had my fair share, not just as a normal person, but also as my professional mermaid persona. Heck, it's part of my message to people as a mermaid - that it's okay to be exactly who you are, that you shouldn't have to apologize or hide from others just because they'd treat you differently, even cruelly. Hold your head high and keep treading water, because the waters do get calmer. Not permanently, or perfectly, but the first step to being happy is loving yourself just the way you are. =)
I get where the bill's writers are coming from, I do. But I'm afraid that some people might see the way it's worded as giving them a loophole to keep doing what they're doing. =/
I just want Michigan's kids to become Michigan's adults. As adults and parents, it's our duty to make their futures a better, happier place.
Rob Kirby
11:39 am on Friday, November 11, 2011
The funny part school districts have had harassment policies for years. Look at your student code of conduct. if the law hasnt gone far enough then maybe the local governments can fix that with policies or ordinances that can cover it. Contact your local government entities for suppoort.
Chris K
11:49 am on Friday, November 11, 2011
Excellent point!
Lynn Jacobs
2:15 pm on Friday, November 11, 2011
This is an extremely complex issue, and as Erin Maday points out (and perhaps others as well) in the age of Twitter, FB, MySpace etc. , bullying has reached a new level. It's a sad state of affairs when it's to the level that the State has to legislate against the heinous nature of all bullying encompasses- its a moral and societal failure that its even reached this level- if even one person is driven to self harm because of anothers words or actions, we've all failed. Where is the accountability? How do we address it when the kids hatred of a class,race, gender or sexual identity is learned from their elders?Starting by convincing people hat think bullying is somehow o.k, not harmful, or not worth addressing is the first step- it IS wrong, it IS unacceptable, and sadly, it almost always comes from a place of being bullied one's self or feeling inadequate, and "acting out" on another person. This isn't 'feel- good mumbo jumbo'- it's called a sense of humanity, it extends to what we think, what we do, what we teach our kids.
Lynn Jacobs
2:16 pm on Friday, November 11, 2011
continued....I've always felt that at the heart of bullying is a lack of personal self-esteem and a disconnection from others- this is why, even more than legislation, we need to incorporate more in the way of "Positive Behavioral Support" initiatives into the schools ( which GP already does). The more connected people feel, the less they are inclined to bully- its the internet with its sense of anonyminity that breeds bullying. Accountability has to be a part of the conversation, and if the parents aren't on the same page, its an uphill battle.
debrarai@yahoo.com
9:00 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
worthless law. and agreed, outlines how to get away with it!..Can't the elected people do better than this? I think so. Please do