patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Chesterfield Township Police Layoffs Put on Hold

A large crowd that included members of the police department gathered Tuesday night at the Board of Trustees meeting.

 

A moratorium was placed Tuesday night on police layoffs in Chesterfield Township, following approximately three hours of passionate talks between officials, residents and members of the force.

A majority of Board of Trustees agreed to Trustee David Joseph's proposal to hold off on the reductions for 90 days or less. The move, favored 5-2, means that the township will re-evaluate ways to combat a looming $1.9-million shortfall. And, that approximately 14-16 employees slated for pink slips on the force can keep their jobs for a while longer.

"I know there is a solution here; I know there is," said Joseph, noting comments and suggestions from seasoned police veterans and residents in the crowd of about 250.

Tax proposal may go back to voters

Many board and community members said the best solution would be to put the tax hike proposal back to voters, but this time with a sunset provision. Some critics of the November ballot didn't agree the tax collection should be indefinite--a stance township officials said Tuesday they understand.

Joseph rallied for the layoffs to become public discussion on the agenda that did not include any items about police, although residents and township officials expected the conversation to turn to police. The move to do so followed Police Chief Bruce Smith and Supervisor Michael Lovelock's comments that layoffs were expected soon. To many in the audience, the open talks were welcome and greeted with applause. The board, however, voted on the matter before comments were heard from residents.

Lovelock pointed out that he did not want to lay off police but the public rejection of the November tax increase led to the decision.

"You have to be fiscally responsible," Lovelock said.

"This is not a job for the meek and the mild," he added. "I haven't slept for a day and a half because I knew this meeting was coming."

Smith attended the meeting but declined to comment afterward to Patch.

Money needed, ideas welcome

Although Trustee Brian (Scott) DeMuynck and Joseph sparred over moratorium length, DeMuynck eventually agreed with the 90-days-or-less time frame. Trustee Hank Anderson, Clerk Cindy Berry and Treasurer Linda Hartman also voted in favor of it. Lovelock and Trustee Christine Bell voted against it.

"We need to come up with $1.9 million of new ideas," Hartman said. "There's nothing left to do but do another millage."

Bell said she supports the police department but it "seems like a mathematical fact of life" that the failed millage means staff reductions until more money comes in.

Eighty-two percent of the department's revenue goes to staff wages. There are about 52 employees on the force, according to the township.

Board, union and residents to collaborate

Officer Brian McNair, a township police union rep, said the union was approached by the chief with a proposal calling for 13 officers to be affected by a plan to reduce staffing--four of whom would have been moved to dispatch. When the union rejected that offer, 16 officers were then slated for pink slips, he said. 

McNair and other police leaders offered to work with the board in attempt to save jobs and keep staffing levels intact as much as possible.

Many residents and community leaders spoke of collaborating to reach a common goal--avoiding the dissolution of the police department.

New Baltimore Police Chief Tim Wiley, who spoke of Chesterfield police's assistance after a medical scare, also offered to help. 

"This is not a Chesterfield problem alone. This is a Bay-area problem," Wiley said.

Township resident Jan Uglis, who's also a former Chesterfield Township clerk, said the township should do everything in its power to avoid disbanding the force in favor of a Macomb County Sheriff's Office contract.

"I always said 'Our department looks good in blue' and I always said 'There ain't going to be brown in our town,'" she said, referring to the color of the Sheriff's Office uniforms.

As attendees left the municipal offices, township police blocked off Sugarbush in one direction while paramedics responded to a medical call at a nearby home.

Tell us in the comments' section below what you think about this issue.

Related Topics: Chesterfield Township, Chesterfield Township police, Millage, and tax proposal

Maximus Max

8:21 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Several points. One is I already lay some of the blame at the feet of their union. You bring in common sense proposal's and their answer is always the same. I ask you officers who want to continue to work for us here in the township to consider leaving this organization and working with us directly. You can pocket your dues yourselves. Remember, we are a right to work state.

Second can someone please explain the math to me? $1,900,000÷15=$126,666.67 per paycheck. So you want me to accept that it costs us Chesterfield residents a quarter of a million dollars PER year, PER officer? Something stinks.

Third there still to my knowledge has not been one cast savings proposal put forth by an elected member of the board. Roll up your sleeves and get to work. That's why you're there.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Concerned Citizen

3:20 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Maximus: $126,666.67 is not a quarter of a million dollars. 250,000.00 is a quarter of a million dollars. About cost savings, they have been making cuts for years. Now let the police officers come to the table with what they are willing to give up to help save their fellow officers. They were not willing to open their contract before they went for a millage the first time.

Pavel Bure

9:48 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

As a police officer from another community, one of the main reasons I chose to move to Chesterfield instead of Macomb Township was because of our own dedicated police force. From what I've read currently the department has 1 officer per 1k residents and which is a very good ratio. As we begin to develop vacant portions of the Township these area will now require additional police attention. Laying off these officers will significantly increase response times and safety of the residents.

As for contracting with the sheriffs department, Macomb Township just recently increased their millage rate almost 2 years before the contract was set to expire. I also haven't found how many officers per 1k residents is covered by the sheriffs department with the contract but I can believe it is significantly lower then the coverage we enjoy. Also how long do those sheriffs assigned to the Macomb Township work that area. I can tell you that with all the different sub divisions, it takes year to know the in's and out's of the beat. If I hop a couple fences and run 3 streets eastbound, I can tell you what sub division I'm in and what street I'm on. That is something the sheriff's department can't offer if they change assignments yearly.

Reply

Chesterfield Resident

9:48 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Why is a millage increase the only solution? Personally I cannot afford more taxes. The current police millage is the largest portion of my tax bill already. I have no more money to contribute to Chesterfield's coffers.

Reply

John P

9:48 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

First of all the Police are exempt from the current change in Michigan's Right to Work law. Secondly only a fool would negotiate on his own. Right to Work will only lower the standards for all workers of this state by making the unions weaker. This will cause even further declines in our tax revenue and will not bring any jobs with it. That is a lie to take away the true intent of no Rights at Work law. Someday in the near future we will be faced with more poverty, more crime and lower schools performance because of Right to Work provision a proven statistic about Right to Work for Less States. Fortunately for the Police they are not subject to that. I am for saving money for the residents of this township but I for one appreciate the Police coverage in my neighborhood. There is always a price for safety and if they save one life it is worth it. I applaud the council's decision to allow time for a new approach and if one is not found I would be for a increase to protect my family and the residents of this Township. I am new to Chesterfield going on seven years but this Police force is top of the line. I suggest you let the Police officers decide their fate collectively it is in the best interest in everyone involved. The Republican's in control of our state forced Right To Work For Less for political gain. I can assure you that this will be their downfall and Mr Snyder, Mr Brandenburg and Miss Lafontaine will have a run for their money in 2014.

Reply

Frank Cusumano

3:20 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

I live in Macomb Township, and the Sheriffs do an excellent job. Response times are quick and the officers are courteous. It is EFFICIENT to use them, and pay as we go. Macomb enjoys a $29 Million dollar surplus that would be eaten up by unsustainable legacy costs. It is very interesting how, in Macomb Township, we seem to be able to balance reality with need. For example, our subdivision makes due on $50 per year association dues. That's right $50 per year, unchanged for 14 years. If you or a loved one is interested in affordable living, without rapacious public sector unions clinging to a "zombie paradigm" (dead but still walking around as if nothing has changed), then you should consider Macomb Township and Altermattfarms Subdivision. www.altermattfarms.org

Reply
Comment_arrow

BlogNog

1:12 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

....thank you. The Sheriff does an excelent job in all surrounding communities.

BlogNog

3:20 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

WTF? 250 cops and their friends and family show up and you flip-flop like typical politicians. Maybe if enough people complain, you can finally get Mitt Romney into the White House? Ohhh wait, he's with that party that doesn't want more taxes (grow a spine)

Reply
Comment_arrow

kidcat24

4:22 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

No they just raise the gas tax to the hilt and fees (the republican version of taxes) go through the ceiling. But hey 1.8 billion dollars to the "job creators" is much more important than the middle class and poor. Do you know what Walmart's welfare costs us?

Comment_arrow

PJ

4:22 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

I showed up and I am not a cop or in a cop's family. I am a concerned resident that thinks the township officials should do a better job of managing the budget to keep police officers for our safety. I pay taxes, so I do my part and hold up my end of the bargain. Their part is to provide my family the services that I pay for, including adequate police protection. They cannot blame a poorly written millage proposal that didn't pass.

Comment_arrow

kidcat24

5:05 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

I too showed up and I am not a cop or have family in the department.

Ray Smart

3:20 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Max,

Quater of a million dollars=$250,000 not $126,666. And even at $126,666 not a bad deal per officer when you think about salary+benifits+retirement. They are not pocketing $126,666 you idiot!

Reply

Ray Smart

3:20 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Max,
Quater of a million dollars=$250,000 not $126,666. And even at $126,666 not a bad deal per officer when you think about salary+benifits+retirement. They are not pocketing $126,666.

Reply

Frank Cusumano

5:05 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Until you realize that American Workers cannot compete with $0.60 S. Chinese labor, you will not be able to understand the depths of the deceit, chicanery and false hope BOTH parties foist upon the public. Add to that, the death grip that other special interests have over the legislature that make Michigan less competitive in the "global market" - such as the insurance industry and its extravagant (and mandatory health insurance) No-Fault. The betrayal is complete and total.

Reply

Concerned Citizen

8:17 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Alot of residents across the state, are angry with their Cities and Townships, becasue of what they feel is money mis-management. The truth of the matter is, that the State of Michigan is suppose to be sharing revenue with Municipalities and School Districts and in stead has drastically reduced the amount of revenue sharing. Which in turn has forced Municipalities and School Districts to do what ever they can to fix the situation, which in most cases means going back to their residents with their hats in their hands asking for some type of tax increase..... We need to stop focusing on our local goverment's and start focusing on the State Government, who is a big part of why our Cities, Townships, and School Districs are failing.......Everyone remember Proposal A well thats where this mess started!!

Reply

Maximus Max

4:32 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Jeez, you make one mistake and...oh nevermind...

I still vote no every time.

Reply

steve

7:09 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

Use the sherrifs dept and lower all of our taxes, if they can't live with the $5,000 a year property taxes on my home then so be it. Thats right $5000 a year already for a modest home in this community. So yeah thats right when my mortgage is paid off and i want to retire in this community it is gonna cost me $50,000 every 10 years just to keep a house I would have worked and paid for my whole life. Get over it we already pay way too much, use the sheriffs office, I am sure most of our officers would be hired by the sheriffs office as it has been done with other communitys.

Reply
Comment_arrow

BlogNog

2:38 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

....YES, Use the sheriffs dept and lower all of our taxes. Everything is going up (groceries, gasoline, no-fault insutance, medical bills) Ive got no health insurance but Im going to jump on board with another tax increase? No way.....

Leave a comment