Chesterfield Township Police Layoffs Will Take Effect by Seniority
Several department employees are expected to be laid off because the November millage didn't pass, according to the township.
- By Christy Arboscello
- Email the author
- February 14, 2013
Chesterfield Township is expected to lay off as many as 14 employees because the tax increase proposal failed in November, Supervisor Michael Lovelock said Thursday.
"They're going to take effect," Lovelock said.
Without specifying, he said that every position in the department is under consideration for layoffs and it will be determined by seniority. The union contract calls for staff reductions to affect those with lesser seniority before those with more years in.
"As many as 14 and a minimum of 10," employees will be affected soon by the layoffs, he said.
Although the department is fully funded for 2013, the cuts are taking place so the force is not in poor financial shape at the end of the year, he said.
"It's called financial responsibility to the residents of Chesterfield Township," Lovelock said. "It's called good government. ... We have to do them now."
The cuts are necessary to keep the department intact, as opposed to disbanding the force in favor of a Macomb County Sheriff's Office contract, according to the township.
"I said from Day One 'We will have a police department in Chesterfield Township,'" Lovelock said, adding Thursday that remains the case.
Chesterfield Township Police Chief Bruce Smith has not responded to repeated requests for comment.
Smith previously said he hoped to put the tax proposal back on the ballot, but with a sunset provision, to avoid layoffs. The previous language called for an additional 2.5 mills to be collected in perpetuity to the existing 5 mills. Township officials and auditors called for more money for the force, saying decreased tax revenue ultimately led to a dwindling police fund.
The police tax was turned down by 52.3 percent of voters and favored by 47.7 percent, according to county election results and the Chesterfield Township Clerk's Office.
Read More in Police & Fire
DTE Offers Tips to Avoid Getting Tricked by Utility Scam ArtistsIn This article
See moreSee More on Patch
- Chesterfield Township to Hold Meeting on Police Budget
- Pedestrian Seriously Injured in Chesterfield Township
- UPDATED: Macomb County Sheriff Says Chesterfield Police Chief Requested Investigation
- Chesterfield Invites Public to Police Layoff Talks
- Chesterfield Supervisor: 'We Have to Live Within Our Means' (VIDEO)
Maximus Max
8:48 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
I feel bad we can't afford to employ more police officers. We're really tapped out. I do believe that if our City Council sat down and looked really, really hard they could find you guys some more money by doing without other things that are not as important during these hard times. We, as citizens will help you guys out in any way we can. We are all in this together. Once our country has accountable and capable leadership that stops taxing us to death, we should begin to recover from this mess we find ourselves in. Of course we still have 4 more years of their policies to deal with, so unfortunately none of you will likely be coming back to work any time soon. Again, I feel badly about this. Elections have consequences.
patch reader
12:02 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Is it any secret that our economy has been on the downturn for several years, along with property values and taxes? It seems to me with all of our well paid elected officials, that someone could have some foresight that changes needed to be made before coming to the edge of the "cliff" so to speak. Here in the private sector we have had to forecast as to work load, spending, etc.
Shawn
3:08 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Is anyone surprised? Of course this was the ramifications of that millage not passing and we begin to wonder who in the heck thought of that ridiculous amount of time for this millage increase. Laying off is the easiest thing to do. A path of least resistance and a way of blaming the public for this injustice. How dare they allow an outside source review the spending habits of these departments.Once again the board feels their hands are clean by making these proclamations and boast, to themselves, of a job well done. One even has the audacity to say this is a "Good government" decision. The heads of these departments are all wet and should begin to answer questions at the public meetings instead of making mime impressions. Here's an idea! Have those responsible for this decision sit in the new Splash Park and auction off, to the highest bidder, the chance to throw the switch at the grand opening. I am sure there are allot of people willing to donate to this and sure to raise enough funds to keep some of these officers on the roads. To our officers, on behalf of the citizens, we apologize for the actions of your bosses.
sheila
11:26 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
Tuesday February 19th at 7pm, we will all have the oppurtunity to voice our concerns about this. I for one, will be there. This is absolute nonsense, cheapscape township residents, like an additional 100-300 dollars a year would really break anyone! The cheapscapes who voted it down, ill bet they will be the jerks whinning about how long it takes for the dept to respond to a call. Hope your all proud of yourselves to save a few bucks and now 14 decent people are out of a job, take your saved money and stuff it up your ass!
Concerned Citizen
10:41 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013
It is a sad day for our township. I hope the elected officials rethink putting a millage with a 5 or 10 year end date back on the ballot this year. We need our police. It is one of the vital necessities in our town. People pass millages for the DIA, SMART Bus, the zoo, and swimming pools, but they didn't back our own police department. I believe it would pass if it had a 5 or 10 year deadline. Hope they reconsider.
Shawn
8:03 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Am I to understand that this will not be placed back on the ballots? If not.....could this be a preamble to contracting with the sheriff's office? Maybe an intentional one at that.
kmr
8:03 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
How many schools are in chesterfield Twp? We need police patrol!!!!!
RATT
8:15 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Issues at hand were that the Police Chief decided to put this on the ballot in perpetuity (Indefinite time). Now that the citizens saw through this, he wants to go and create a Special election to run this up the pole again. The only problem is that typically the only ones that vote at special elections are the people that have been handpicked by the group sponsoring the vote. In this case it would be the police department and whomever they could convince to vote in favor. As far as Sheila above, it is not a matter of cheapskates, but a matter of fiscal responsibility. This township has seen it's problems with Police Chiefs and Supervisors in the past. Nothing wrong with wanting to look at alternative options.
BlogNog
10:25 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Totally agree Ratt (Im not a cheapskate) just streched to the limit. Every politician from here to Washington has his hand in my wallet and Im sick of it (Shelia, have you looked at the price of gas lately?) my car insurance just went thru the roof (Michigan is the highest in the country)
Chief Smith will keep trying until they shove it down out throat. All near-by communiuties are currently patroled by the Macomb County Sheriff and they are doing fine (for less money) and we already pay Macomb County as it is.....