Voters Pass Gogh, Tell DIA to Collect $230M from Macomb, Oakland, Wayne Counties
The Detroit Institute of Arts millage passed in Macomb, Oakland and Wayne counties on Tuesday.
As of 10 a.m. Wednesday, anyone in the tri-county area can visit the Detroit Institute of Arts for free.
The former admission fee has been tossed to the wind thanks to voters in Macomb, Oakland and Wayne counties passing the Arts Authority Millage, more commonly known as the DIA millage, on Tuesday.
Tri-county voters approved a tax of 0.2 mills for the next 10 years to fund the arts authority.
“We feel wonderful,” said Annmarie Erickson, the DIA’s chief operating officer. “We want to thank voters throughout the area with coming out for such a strong showing of support. We are so deeply appreciative of the work of our staff and volunteers and everyone who got behind this campaign and pushed it forward to a successful completion.”
A Party Atmosphere
About 200 supporters gathered in the DIA's Prentis Court on Tuesday to watch the election results trickle in.
Among them was Tim Sullivan of Royal Oak. The operations manager of Ford Motor Co.'s Ford Credit turned his own vehicle into a billboard for the DIA.
He used DIA posters to create a sun visor that he used in his car whenever it was parked. He said he always made sure to back into parking spots so that others could easily see the DIA message he was sporting.
“The DIA is an institution that is worth saving,” he said. “I come here regularly on Friday nights for concerts and I come here for the exhibits. … It truly is a resource that belongs to the community and the community really does need to help support it.”
After posting hundreds of Facebook messages urging support of the millage and posting just as many signs and posters throughout the community, Sullivan said the Tuesday night party was well deserved.
“I can honestly say I did everything in my power to get the word out, to get support and to get people to vote,” he said. “I’m just here to celebrate tonight.”
Bernadette Lussier of Grosse Pointe also was celebrating Tuesday night at the DIA.
The attorney by day, DIA volunteer by night, spent several hours over the last few months at a calling center where she phoned voters in Macomb and Oakland counties, urging them to support the millage.
"The reactions were a nice mix,” she said. “A lot of enthusiasm. A lot of people wanted to share their stories of the museum and all the special exhibitions.. … Some people were very adamant about not wanting to support any additional taxes on their property and I respected their opinion. And others were just very fond of the city of Detroit and hope it does well.”
After her day job on Tuesday, Lussier spent a couple hours working the polls in St. Clair Shores and Sterling Heights.
"Some people didn’t even know about it and were really receptive once I explained it to them," she said. "People tend to support the DIA once they know about it."
Voters Come Through
The proposal passed narrowly with 50.5 percent of the vote in Macomb County, with all 353 Macomb County precincts reporting. It looks to pass with a much larger margin in Oakland County. With all 522 percent of precincts reporting, 63.7 percent of voters were in favor of the millage. The proposal passed with 64.4 percent of the vote in Wayne County, with 93 percent of precincts reporting.
Erickson is the first to admit that watching the results come in Tuesday was a nail biter.
“It was closer than we would have liked, but it feels good,” she said. “This has been such an incredible team effort on the part of so many people. ... "The volunteers and the staff at this place really put themselves out. It was this crazy energy and they put so much into it. And they get the payoff tonight, which is wonderful."
At 0.2 mills, a taxpayer owning a $200,000 home, with a taxable value of $100,000, would be expected to pay about $20 a year.
While these values will vary county to county, the millage is expected to generate at least $9.8 million from Oakland, $4.9 million from Macomb and $8.3 million from Wayne.
In return for this financial support, residents from the supporting counties, including school groups, will receive free admission to the museum for the next decade.
These public funds, about $23 million per year, or $230 million over the next decade, will be used to cover the museum’s operating expenses and not to increase the museum’s endowment.
“We’ll take the proceeds from the millage (and) use them to cover our operating expenses,” Erickson said. “We will then turn our fund-raising skills to building an unrestricted operating endowment – our future nest egg.”
Erickson said museum officials hope to increase their $100 million endowment to $350 million in the next 10 years.
“At that level, we will be able to live fairly well of the interest at the core of those endowments," she said. "We’ll take 4.76 percent of that investment income and apply that to our operating expenses.”
The museum will never touch those core investments, which will allow the core endowments to continue to grow, Erickson added.
“This will allow for the creation of a completely different financial model," she said.
Per the Art Institute Service Agreement the DIA has entered into with each of the counties’ arts authorities – whose members are appointed by the respective counties’ commissioners and county executives – the tax can be withheld if the DIA is believed to have breached its contract.
The money raised can only be spent in compliance with the contract between the arts authorities and the DIA – none of it can go into the City of Detroit’s treasury. An annual audit will ensure the money is being spent appropriately.
Full Support, from the Top Down
Graham Beal, director of the DIA, is recovering from laryngitis, but didn't let his sore throat keep him from making an appearance at Tuesday night's election party.
“This has been a fantastic team effort,” he told the crowd of supporters. “It’s been a long haul. … Everyone who is in this room tonight has made a tangible contribution to this successful effort and I want to thank you. “
Beal said voters have given the DIA a new lease on life. One in which he said he hopes never has to rely on taxpayer funding again.
“We can now begin to make serious plans for the next 10 years,” he said. “We’ll use those 10 years, amongst other things, to make sure we never have to go through this process again.”
Beal said he came to the DIA with a mission and he's finally beginning to think that it could come true.
“I came to Detroit 13 years ago,” he said. “I knew that there were certain things I wanted to do as far as the art collection. We did that with the new DIA opening in 2007. I had a second notion that we would be in a position to solve the DIA’s ongoing financial stability problems.
"Six years ago, that looked like a completely lost cause. We knew that we were heading toward serious problems after we opened. But the new DIA was so successful in terms of establishing itself in the minds of the public as their museum that it enabled us to go for this millage. So to me, this is the kind of success you hardly dare think of having.”
While the campaign was a long, hard fight, Beal said, it came down to a typical politics 101 lesson.
“In the end, our volunteers really were our strength,” he said. “We had tens of thousands of people who were willing to put in time and effort. Whatever we did strategically and tactically, in the end, this is a get-out-the-vote campaign and we got out the vote.”
kidcat24
12:18 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
YES! Very happy this passed.
Bill Peters
9:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Yes it passed along with the Director's 400K per year salary
walden schmidt
10:02 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Who is underpaid when compared to other museums, with comparable collections, in the country.
Haulin T Male
10:34 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
400 k salary, huh, more then the president of the U S A, or the gov. or the mayor.. wth?
Angela
9:20 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012
The director of the Lourve makes less than this guy does. No wonder Michigan is bankrupt. They deserve nothing less than total devastation.
Leslie Curtis
11:07 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
@Angela I doubt if this guys salary had anything to do with the entire countries economic meltdown and the falling of Detroit's middle class....Which actually is occurring in just about EVERY major city in the U.S.
petey
12:26 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I would like to see some salary numbers and some accountability from the DIA,now that we are helping pay their bills!
Right2Work
9:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
AMEN! This initiative was for the museum, not Graham's and the other administrators' retirement fund. Keep it lean!!!
picturegirl
2:54 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I agree with petey, I like the DIA but where is the financial accountability? The rest of us had to make cuts and adjustments when the economy is in a downturn. The free admission is not free - you're paying through your taxes!
Les
10:22 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
About a week ago in the Detroit papers they listed salaries --- we placed second to end in major Midwest city museums!
Bob Jackie
12:32 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Outstanding. Everyone come on down and see some beautiful things. Expand your mind and soul.
Robert
4:41 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
And while you’re there you can pay an exorbitant amount for parking, get robbed, your car broken into, harassed by drug dealers and prostitutes. Golly G that sounds great!
Erik Roberts
12:32 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
So happy this passed. I'm sure we'll hear the "where's the money going" but it's now free for us to go (minus the 20$ a year on the tax bill). It's a true gem...those questioning should check it out.
Bill Peters
9:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Nothing is free-unless you are a renter
GP For Life
10:05 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Bill, I didn't know that people who own rental properties didn't pay taxes!
Oh, wait. They do pay taxes and can't claim the homestead exemption, so they actually pay more taxes. Presumably landlords don't rent at a loss so they pass those taxes along to their renters.
So it looks like you're getting the "free ride" here.
Buddyb
10:37 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Hey GP for Life, your landlord was taking you to the cleaners. I was a landlord in Ferndale for 4 years and I paid all the taxes and they paid the rent. My wife rented in Ferndale for 3 years and she never paid a dime in property taxes.
Sorry your landlord made you pay rent and taxes, not trying to mean but your the only person I've ever heard of that's paid rent and property taxes. First time for everything I guess.....
GP For Life
10:48 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I am not sure how you misunderstood me, but you did. Rent, is a function of many things, one of these variables is property taxes. Rent is a cost of the landlord who then passes that cost onto their tennants through the vehicle of rent.
Buddyb
11:06 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
GP for life, if your a renter and I suspect that you are? You have a contract between yourself and your landlord or dwelling in which you reside that states how much you will pay monthly for your contractual obligation. You could vote yes on every millage in the world and "your rent" will not go up!!! My mortgage on the other hand will. I hope this clears matters up for you.
GP For Life
11:16 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I can't help you.
EHM
12:13 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Buddyb, once your contract is up for renewal then they will pass on the increases to you. Your rent isn't a fixed price forever! So yes, ultimately any increase in costs for the owner will be passed onto the renters.
Jim Routhier
1:04 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
You wrongfully assume that those who opposed this never go to the DIA. That is simply not true. One can oppose this and still be a patron of the DIA. I for one did not support the proposal, and I frequent the DIA. I would have preferred that the DIA find the money elsewhere and not on the backs of ALL regional taxpayers.
First the zoo, and now the DIA. Any other Detroit owned and operated institutions that need a bailout from the suburbs?
Kathi Manteuffel Seidl
1:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Very clever headline, Patch. :)
DJG
9:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I'm dissapointed to see this pass. Henry Ford and Greenfield Village seem to operate just fine without tax payer assistance. With the amount of money the staff makes (the Director is over 400K a year) You'd think they could find a way to fund and actually run this business.
However, at 20 bucks on average a year...it's really not worth crying or worrying over.
I know it's a beautiful place and I love history. I just respectfully disagree it's the tax payer's expense to bail it out. What's next, a millage to keep the DSO running?
Eric B
9:45 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Totally agreed!
Birmingham Mom
10:09 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Well said.
Dave
4:12 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Completely agree with you DJG this was a money grab just like the bank bailouts! The other places do it without handouts. More $ out of my families pocket, sure its only 15 or 20 but when you add all the other 15 or 20's its gettin up to the 100 range. It all adds up.
Robert
4:44 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
DJG, great points, but its $20 per $200K value of your home. This is nothing more than a tactic for the City of Detroit to tax the suburbs. DIA has over $100 Million sitting in the bank for a rainy day. I believe there's a storm cloud overhead
lbcya
12:05 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Perfectly said, DJG I could not agree more. I am quite surprised everyone is so cool with this, with all the struggles the people are having these days. 100 million dollar endowment sounds pretty large to me, and 2 million a month to operate the place...seems a bit much for janitorial and guards, jus saying.
Patricia Kane
6:55 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
So, our taxes just went up (again) we already saw in increase with the schools, our water bill thanks to Detroit is through the roof, our utilities have continued with less usage to increase, our health care added a total of of $6,670.00 per year we pay just for premiums through our employers, not deductibles or co-pays, our property value declined on our 893 square foot house, but the taxable value went up again, we lost money for retirement, not seeing any wage increase, and the Director of the DIA gets $443,000.00 and another tax levied on us to support his job--I quit.
Oakland County, this State and Detroit is a screwed up mess. We continue to do mini "bail outs". I use to support the DIA, but not when I am forced to. Pretty soon, all of our money is out the door- I am certain on a salary of $443,000.00 $20-50 bucks in taxes is nothing-on paychecks that are less, it is something and something that taxes was not structured for-"entertainment" for group of persons with a selected interest.
Does this mean Oakland Cty will now have a say in leadership and salary at the DIA?
I doubt it-they just want the money-will people from other counties get free admission
on our dollar? Also, the "free admission" is not free for all programs--and the $20.00 is not 20--it is $20.00 per 100K--most people will pay more. Before we talk about expanding our souls we better talk about expanding our wallets-the DIA now has their hands in it.
TJ
9:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I couldn't agree more!
JH
9:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
$20 per $100k of the tax assessed value. Most will pay less.
The average tax assessed value in Royal Oak is less than $70k, meaning the average homeowner here will pay less than $14 a year for this tax - that's a dollar a month.
Frank D.
9:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Exactly the reaon why I voted NO....
Sharon
9:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I feel your pain. The jail millage also passed - so not only are we paying for the DIA bailout, we have to bail out the jail instead. If our individual households have to tighten our budgets, why doesn't the DIA and jails????
Mark Ford
10:35 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Right on the money Patricia! This should NEVER have been put to a vote. It's just another example of "we the people" bailing out another failing business. And, how in the hell can anyone justify the Director's outrageous salary? Like many suburbanites, if I want to visit the DIA and pay to do so, that is MY CHOICE.
"It's only $20.00" , are you kidding me? The amount is not the issue, it's the fact that this additional tax was voted on in the first place. Finally, it absurd to compare this tax to funding law enforcement services in Rochester Hills.
Greg B
2:13 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
100% behind you on this one Patricia! Thanks for putting my feelings into words!
BTW - I have never been nor do I have plans on ever going to the DIA, anyone wanna buy my "$20.00" membership? LOL!
Steve Herrington
9:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Amen Patricia, it's insanity.
Jeff Johnson
9:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
First I gotta say that I LOVE the arts and I certainly do enjoy a nice trip to the DIA about once a year.
Awesome feedback Patricia. This proposal passing will only lead to more extra-governmental bodies with little or no oversight. It will never stop because they can never have enough control over our money.
What we really need is a law prohibiting any tax increases in a primary election where they know only 20-30% of the voters will even be thinking about voting. Pretty shady to play it like that, but it works well for the schools right? So that law will never happen.
Did anyone else see the report on channel 4 last night that they plan to use some of our money for fundraising purposes? I guess they have to make up the $2M they spent lobbying for their own cause somehow. $25M/year of new money isn't enough before they leave the after party.
The one thing you can count on is that the new $25M/year will be used the same way their original $25M/year was used for. To mismanage the DIA.
Andrea Daniell
9:32 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Are you honestly saying we should cater to the 70-80% of people who give up their right to vote voluntarily? Not pass important legislation because people aren't doing their civic duty? That's really quite frightening of an idea! And as someone who managed to vote yesterday, it quite honestly angers me a bit.
JH
9:42 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
The more they spend on successful fundraising the better. Think about it... would you rather they ask for more money from the homeowners or ask for less and spend part of it to solicit additional money in donations? I am pleased they asked for a modest amount and still plan to work hard at fundraising for the rest of the money they need.
CHARLES WASILEWSKI
9:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
WELL SAID PATRICIA. IT'S HARD FOR ME TO BELIEVE THAT THE VOTERS CONTINUE TO WANT MORE TAXATION??? AND IN SPITE OF PROPERTY VALUES 1/2 OF WHAT THEY WERE, MY TAX BILL HAS GONE UP! CROOKS, CROOKED AND WORSE.
Mike
11:48 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
There are many reasons why your property taxes may have risen this year. Largely it would depend on when you bought your home. If it was more than 15-20 years ago, then your property taxes had been increasing more slowly than the value of your house was. When prices fell, the corresponding decline in the taxable value never fell to the level that your property taxes were being calculated at, so your taxes continued to rise while others fell. The people calculating your property taxes are not crooks. Take the time to figure out why your taxes are going up instead of slandering people who work hard to keep our communities functioning.
Diane Young
9:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Very happy! We will be going a lot more often to the DIA- I can't wait to see the Vemeer this month.
Leslie Curtis
10:12 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
This will benefit the entire metro Detroit region.
Christine
9:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
My membership each year cost $80.00. This is a bargain to support one of the great treasures of Detroit. If all are paying through taxes, more will be motivated to visit.
Robert
4:51 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
That's just great Christiana; I guess you feel that compulsorily payments are good for society? How long do you think it will be free, or should I say how long you think I’ll have to subsidize you and other before someone decides that they need to charge an entry fee? This will start off by only charging for special events, then every occasion will become a special event, soon after everyone will forget about the “free days” and they begin charging full admission. Keep in mind, at one time tax dollars from the city were allotted to pay for the DIA. What happened to those funds? Is someone in jail for misappropriation of funds? I doubt it. You’ve been taken!
Patricia Kane
7:14 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Glad we are subsidizing your personal interests-- Taxation does not motivate--if anything it is discouraging to pay out more and more--Detroit has never sent money our way--it's a one way street.
Christine
9:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
It is a slippery slope when we start comparing and criticizing salaries. I'm certain the Director of the DIA is paid comparably to his peers at other major institutions.
If one must criticize salaries, why not start with sports stars or musicians?
Joe
9:31 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Because their (sports stars & musicians) jobs produce their own income. Don't get me wrong, they make a shocking amount for what they do, but enough people pay to watch / listen to them for them to make that much.
It's not as if anyone's asking to increase my property taxes to help pay Matthew Stafford's salary.
Eric B
9:52 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I can't recall his name, but there was a member of the DIA (Board of Directors, I think it was) on WJR a few days ago who admitted without saying "yes" that the DIA director is paid more than the director at the Louvre. That's quite outrageous, I believe.
Bill Peters
9:55 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Ahh no-New York IA is paid about 125K
Leslie Curtis
10:16 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
So Joe you actually think the owners of sport franchises and the recording industry actually pay directly out of their pockets? You forget most tax dollars pay for the arena's that are built for these teams and entertainment venues..Well maybe you didn't know but you do now.
Joe
11:14 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Leslie - Again, not a good comparison. Did anyone ask you to raise your property taxes when ANY of the stadiums were built? No. Some of the money used to build them did come from tax funded accounts, but taxes that were already in place (like sales taxes for example - Not an increase to our property taxes). The City / State can choose to use our tax money on these stadiums, because they in turn produce more tax income.
The City / State have chosen to cut the funding to the DIA lately, instead of using the tax money they already have, for whatever reason (probably because it doesn't produce enough return tax income, and becomes just an expense that doesn't rank as high as other items needing the funding). Therefore, a NEW tax added to our property taxes is the solution? That would NEVER fly for a new sports stadium.
Mark
11:48 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
@ Leslie yes the sports franchises and owners do pay the salaries much the same way any business has a payroll. A certain amount of revenue goes towards salaries, benefits etc. Do they do so at a loss? In most cases no the revenue the sports franchise brings in covers payroll. Taxes most likely do not play a very large part at all in covering any athlete's salary.
Patricia Kane
7:18 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Overpaid -----take in the whole picture---all the facts---overpaid, overpaid, overpaid.
Never once did he mention cutting his half a million dollar package, not once---
overpaid for Detroit, over paid for Michigan, overpaid for the size and scope of the DIA, overpaid-- And Christine, I don't pay salaries for sports stars from my taxes.
Mark
9:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
The voters have spoken. A few of the things I have issues with...
$443,000 for Beal, top dog, pulls down a good chunk of change. Okay, I can deal with it. Paying someone that knows what their doing sometimes pays for itself many times over. But I recall reading that there are also 14 or 15 staffers in the 6 figures.
The millage money is to only go to operations. That's great, I'm sure ll. But the money that used to go to operations now gets shifted to pay for.......?
There were 17 entities on the 2000 and 2002 millage failure. From that group, the Zoo, and now the DIA, have gotten theirs. Look on the horizon folks, here come the rest with their hand out, and look who is leading the way...
Let's start a discussion on what a gem the DSO is now.
JH
9:51 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I don't believe the DSO was ever funded by taxpayers (correct me if I'm wrong!). The DIA was supported by the city and the state, and then both stopped funding it. This is not a case where the DIA was poorly managed and couldn't bring in enough money, it is a case where they were, from the very beginning, supported as a tax-funded institution. When they no longer received the tax dollars, it left their finances a mess.
I am a supporter of the DSO, but I do not think they should, or will, ask for a millage as they never were (to the best of my knowledge) supported by tax payers. If they run out of money (which they kinda have) it really is their own fault (but this I mean the management, not the musicians).
Also, it is not at all practical for the DSO to allow free admission as the DIA has to compensate the taxpayers.
Mark
11:04 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
You are correct JH. The DSO has never been funded by taxpayers. But, and correct me if I'm wrong, I recall reading that they were one of the entities in the 2002 arts millage that failed.
Mark
11:21 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
It was proposal K in 2002 where the DSO is listed along with 16 other institutions.
http://crcmich.org/PUBLICAT/2000s/2002/memo1067.pdf
JH
12:19 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Mark, thanks for the link! As a supporter of the arts, I can say I'm glad that proposal K failed. I think there is a major difference in continuing to support institutions who have always relied on tax dollars until they can build up an endowment to support themselves versus starting to support an institution with tax dollars who never received tax money before. I see this a difference between not screwing institutions who relied on tax money already vs bailing out a failed private enterprise.
I would not vote for a millage to start publicly supporting what had previously been private, but I would (and did) vote to continue supporting the zoo and DIA.
I do hope the Detroit Science Center finds a way to reopen their doors though.
Lynn Jacobs
9:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Regardless for what this means from a taxation standpoint, this will increase the opportunity and incentive to enjoy the DIA for many, many residents of the Metro area, including a large number of children or folks who could otherwise not afford it.
I work in a social service agency that serves a mostly indigent population, with 'incomes' that hover around 10K for families of 4 and 5. One mom I recently spoke with about finding things to do with her son over the summer told me should would have to cut back on groceries for the week to pay a $10.00 admission price to a local waterpark. Her son spends most of his summer in the house playing video games because his neighborhood is not safe enough to play outside.
I hear the argument regarding high salaries and increased taxes, and I can understand and appreciate the argument that taxing the masses is not always the answer. But in this case the issue is much larger than tax dollars and inflated salaries.
There are kids who are going to be able to stand in front of a Van Gogh or a Rembrant who would never otherwise have the opportunity, and who knows what that might lead to.
I'm thrilled this passed, it says a lot about the sense of moral responsibility and it was the right thing to do.
Robert
5:00 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
So let’s make sure I get this right. The family has no money for grocery's and culture, but has plenty of money for video games? I would bet they also have internet access, laptops, cell phone with full internet access, cable TV, and a married of other benefits paid for by tax payers. I though the schools already had programs in place to take kids to the DIA, they do, once again paid for by tax payers. So why on earth do folks like you think that now at this moment the apex of Detroit’s culture rests soundly on the DIA? What has changed.
Leslie Curtis
10:08 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Robert your problem is you make to many assumptions and generalizations. It's people like you that have me fearful to walk the streets of Detroit with a harmonious attitude at times. Because you never know when you're going to pop a screw and go on a shooting rampage about government taxation. I know the Government wants your guns too...Yeah Okay..
Robert
10:18 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Leslie, I do find it interesting how liberals such as yourself tend to accuse conservatives of acting vicious and hateful, but in reality you are the ones displaying such language and actions. read your post back to yourself, then read mine. I stated facts, challenge them if you like, you spit out hate.
Leslie Curtis
11:30 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Robert I'm sorry to tell you I am card caring Republican. However there comes a time when you have to see beyond party lines and social labels (liberal/conservative) and do things that are not at your interest but will help a city that is slowly dying and in of something positive to keep it afloat. As a ex Navy service member I learned that sometimes we have to sacrifice some of my comfort to assist others. This millage is good for all the surrounding suburban areas as well as Detroit. Besides no need to be mad at the people who celebrate this achievement, you should be mad at all the folks who are complaining about it that didn't get out and vote it down. That would make more sense don't you think? On a sidebar note: I believe we all have the right to bare arms I also believe in open carry, However I don't believe the government is trying to take that right away. After all guns are what allowed the United States to become independent from British rule. So why would the government take away what it was actually built upon...Just something to think about...Logical thinking is better than irrational responding.
Robert
11:53 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Leslie, thank you for the comments and I apologize for referring to you as a liberal, but this is not about personal sacrifice, or a betterment to society. It’s about the gross abuse by our governmental system through excessive taxation. It’s preposterous that this ever made it to a vote. With all of the problems in Detroit this was at the top of the list???? When will it be enough? I have no issue with supporting the arts or any other museum or cultural aspect in our society if it in-deed is a true cultural factor and not simply a pet project from a special interest group. I’m not upset that the pay for the director of the DIA is over $400K. But “entertainment” should be supported by those interested in it, not as a compulsorily tax. $20 today will turn in to $40 tomorrow, then $100 and so on. You’ve got to believe that every other program, museum, or special interest will now attempt to litter our voting process with petitions to get a piece of the pie. This is troublesome.
Leslie Curtis
1:02 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Robert I believe the voters are smart enough to see if there's some trickery going on and wouldn't not afford the government the ability to squeeze more tax revenue from the citizens. Allowing Detroit to die would not be beneficial to the surrounding suburbs. No major city = failing suburban cites and those who can't move away from the state will only migrate to the surrounding areas (Yep you got it, the suburbs) that means crime and all. I would rather change the culture of the city to a positive, than to have the culture stay negative and find it's way to my neighborhood.
Eric B
1:12 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
I doubt a trip to the DIA is going to rehabilitate any criminals. If that were the case wouldn't we be sending prison buses and not school buses?
Robert
1:21 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Leslie, excellent point and I would not like to see the Detroit crime come to my neighborhood, but your comments lends to the old adage of throw money at the problem so it leaves you alone. You see the battle between the state trying to fix the problems in the city and those who just want more money to continue the downward trend. They make claims of racism, bigotry, and hate to influence popular sovereignty. Aren’t you tired of this? The DIA is just a microcosm of the issue, but we’ve got to start paying attention to such issues. I have no confidence that additional program petitions will be stifled before being pushed for a vote.
Leslie Curtis
9:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
The DIA is part of culture and sometimes to maintain that cultural experience we as tax payers have to pay for it. There is nothing wrong with paying a little extra for a experience that may change someones life. You can't expect to be part of a region and not be willing to support some of the most important parts of that regions infrastructure which can help in development of our young citizens. In my opinion "The Arts" play a major role in providing in altering some prospective on life. Instead of complaining why don't you just gather up a group of children and take them to the DIA and enjoy the learning experience. After all, it's free.
Mark
9:41 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
The last sentence is incorrect. Should read... "After all, you're paying for it through taxation."
Leslie Curtis
9:52 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Well Mark through taxation we pay for a lot worst things.. I think it's worth an extra $50 that my wife and I would blow on a dinner.
Mark
10:19 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I think it's worth it also. As I've written in previous posts, I attend the DIA at least once a year, sometimes twice if out-of-town friends/family want to attend. This tax is saving me money. I just have issues with the wording of the agreement, it needed to be written up differently. The DIA wasn't going to close up shop if it wasn't passed this time around.
Robert
5:02 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY,COMPULSERARY,COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY,
Rachel L
9:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I'm so happy this passed. Without art, culture dies.
Haulin T Male
10:27 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
It's in Detroit, the culture is killing it self, the whole region will become one giant new city........... culture to me is Belle Isle, Nature etc. some one actually get paid to decide which painting this month will come out, and which one hides in the closet........... we are talking 175 million, as of now, 200 mil. over 10 ....... that is more then cities run on.
as for 1.00 a month, in just my community, the library tax, the tax increase, two headly over rides, the water each yr, not just to use, but to dispose of....... dda tax, side walk tax, county parks, county ???, also, School millage, so we can have kids from the out side, whose parents don't pay our school taxes, 4 million bond for computers, a 23 million road and sewer bond, now a new sewer bond for 4 million, EACH and Every Time, some official comes up with YOUR HOUSE will cost you ????? 1.285. a year......... yikes.... all done on my fixed income.......try and do it, you "Invincible's" do it with out moving back with your parents.
Leslie Curtis
10:09 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Rachel L When will people recognize that? You're so right.
Robert
10:22 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Detroit is already dead. What is needed next is to spend money on bulldozers. We can move the museums out to the suburbs
Mark
10:25 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Yeah Robert I would love to view a Renoir in a building made out of township brick.
Haulin T Male
9:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Pat: your very close. 100 million they have with NO strings attached. 75 million endowment controlled. Oakland Co. will be the biggest contribution. that 100 mil. is enough to run the DPD, so you don't get car jacked or mugged. The very fact if you pass you will get in FREE, is that Bribery ,? or just mismanagement.?
This is only the beginning , of the Regional "implosion" where under the guise of Regional this and that, the Dollars from the "BURBS" will be wanting more and more. notice the Det. City Council, said little on this. "BUT" the Council, told the State to keep your hands off "Belle Isle" that is our jewel, " We know How to run our selves" LOL LOL, watch the local news. yep that was the lady on council. Have you seen the "isle" it is trashed every Saturday Night, with 1000's of plastic cups, doing shots, they pay a city worker,(on Sunday) to use a street cleaner, all day , to sweep them up, I sat and watched him. A State Park all yr. fee, would help in a big way..... or day sticker
Yep, Macomb will be assigned to under write, 1 through 5 precincts, Oakland Co. will be assigned all the rest......... yes get use to it,
This is after we were all told to cross 8 mile, and Don't let the door, hit you, in the booty.
yep think tanks sit, and see the Donut, and where the "HOLE" is wake up, Naive people. before you are subsidizing the whole City of Detroit, (yesterday they voted not to ask for a millage increase for "safety" wth.
Mike
3:15 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
It is not a subsidy for the city of Detroit. It is a subsidy for the DIA. Quite a big difference.
Haulin T Male
10:36 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
doesn't a millage for a govt. use? if this is not a Detroit entity, who owns it.?
Diane
9:25 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Who's next? DSO, Opera House, Museum of African Americans'.......when does this stop?
John Ferguson
9:29 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Alright! I love the D.I.A. It is diamond in the rough! $20-$40 for free DIA for families and the schools. That seems like a deal to me. Maybe more people can appreciate the Art now that the admission is paid for.
JH
9:53 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I just want to point out that it's $20 per $100k of tax assessed value, not the value the house is actually worth.
For example, the average house price in Royal Oak is ~$140k but the average tax assessment is just under $70k, so the average homeowner will be paying less than $14 a year for this tax, not $40.
Mary Howarth
9:43 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Love the headline. Love the DIA. Now residents will have no reason to not visit and see the wonderful treasure that is ours. And all for the price of 10, or less, cups of coffee at Starbucks. Even less than the price of a ticket to most local sporting events.
Diane
10:37 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
So glad you can afford Starbucks, sporting events, etc. but how about those who are struggling to put food on their tables or paying daily living expenses? Will a trip to the DIA fill an empty belly?
Dave
4:31 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
yes Mary but those people want to go to the sporting events and they want their starbucks. The word Want is the thing here. If these silly little chunks of money keep coming out I am gonna have to ask for a millage to bail me out! Besides I live in White Lake so its gonna cost me $20 to get there and back and probably $20 to park and whatever my deductible is for a stolen car and a cab ride home. oops I said that out loud.
Robert
5:04 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY,COMPULSERARY,COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY, COMPULSERARY,
Joe
9:46 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I think the DIA is absolutely great, and I hope it never goes away.
However, there is absolutely no justification to increase and use people's property taxes to pay for it. This is just not what taxes are for. They're for community necessities that everyone needs to use (schools, roads, police, fire, etc).
To force people to fund a museum with their property taxes is unconstitutional. They basically forced every member of the community to buy a pass to the museum (even those that wouldn't want one).
Times are tough for the museum I'm sure, and it would be very sad if it ever closed, but they need to get their own funding from those that CHOOSE to fund it.
Bill IV
9:48 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I voted YES for the DIA even though i have no interest in going to it. Maybe my son when he gets older will appreciate it more. I know the money is mismanaged but for $20 a year, i can't complain about it. I couldn't stand to see one more important attraction in Detroit go down the tubes like so many others before it. It's very important to that area's revital. Hopefully it will pay off in the end.
Ryan S
4:45 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
This is really interesting, Bill. I've been skimming all the comments and believe this is the most unselfish one yet. It isn't that I agree or disagree with all the other points of view, but yours is a nice breath of fresh air for me. Most of the people here are thinking of themselves. MY taxes will be higher or I think it's a great thing. Just a lot of arguing and discord. Thinking of others is something I find rare these days. Hopefully, more people than just your son will appreciate it more. Well played.
Peter Griffin
9:53 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
i would have cost me less to buy tickets at the door (if I even decide to go) for my wife and 3 kids than what this millage is costing me........
Rachel L
10:18 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
That would have been $32. Median house value in wayne county is 98k (http://www.city-data.com/county/Wayne_County-MI.html). So the median tax is an extra $20 per household. So unless you have a house with a much higher than median value, you should be paying less for the whole year, and you can go as many times as you want. And if you are in a house that's valued much higher, I would think you would be able to afford a slight tax increase.
Leslie Curtis
10:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
No it wouldn't Joe unless you earn over 500k annually than you would be paying about $100 annually which a current annual membership only cost $80
Mark
10:38 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Earnings have nothing to do with what the millage will cost you. It's the assessed value of your home. If you paid $150,000 for a home last year. Your assessed value is appx $75,000. So the passed millage will cost you about $15/year.
Peter Griffin
11:46 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
No Mark --- i think you are mistaken. It's not the assessed taxable value for the DIA millage, it's the MARKET VALUE of your home that they use (or 2X the assessed taxable value). This way, it's not capped. If your home goes up by 100,000 or $200,000 in the next 10 years, you will be paying another $10 to $20 per year. If I remember right, didn't Proposal A (years back) cap the amount that your assessed value can be raised each year ---- wasn't it 5% per year??????? By taxing the market value of your home, doesn't the DIA skirt this cap??
Anyway, what bugs me is that we all pay different rates to use the same "museum". Why should someone in Oakland County foot the bill (pay more) for someone in wayne county to use the same DIA??
JH
12:26 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
4x4, just like all other taxes, the millage rate is multiplied by the taxable value, not the market value. Do you expect them to come out and appraise your house in order to tax you?!?
For this to cost you more than ticket prices, your house would have to have a market value of over $320,000. That's assuming you only want to go once in a year. If your house is worth that much then congrats, you've done well for yourself and you're correct that tickets would have been cheaper for you. For most people this is not the case though.
Eric B
9:55 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I read the comments from the director saying that he hopes they won't have to renew this millage, but I'm very doubtful. When's the last time a millage expired without a fight? Once an entity has tapped into a public vein, it's unlikely that they release it voluntarily...
Marcia Robovitsky
10:05 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I recommended a NO vote to PATCH readers before Tuesday's vote because of the wording of the ballot. Without DIA even being mentioned in the ballot language, I still would like to know the" language of the agreement" that was AGREED TO BEFORE the ballot issue was voted on and passed yesterday and I would like the names of the members of that board from all three counties. Could someone please include a link to read that information? Can that "agreement language" CHANGE over the next 10 years of the tax collection? What does the DIA "contract" say with this ART AUTHORITY? Just asking. Thank you.
From the above article: "Per the Art Institute Service Agreement the DIA has entered into with each of the counties’ arts authorities – whose members are appointed by the respective counties’ commissioners and county executives – the tax can be withheld if the DIA is believed to have breached its contract.
The money raised can only be spent in compliance with the contract between the arts authorities and the DIA – none of it can go into the City of Detroit’s treasury. An annual audit will ensure the money is being spent appropriately."
Steve Dahnke
10:11 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Property taxes are exactly what the voters intend them for. In other words, the idea that property taxes are only for educatuon when the ballot initiative clearly states it's to be used for funding an art institution is remarkably ignorant and close-minded- it's as if one closed one's eyes when casting the vote.
The fact that all these people are amazed that peole voted in this tax is amazing, especially since it was so clearly explained. Nowhere did I see any commercials, editorials or protestors saying"hey, don't vote for this, here's why". That would have been the democratic way. After the fact just makes you lazy whiners.
Diane
10:57 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
The DIA had $2 million to spend in getting this passed, those of us against the millage had no funding to mount any opposition.
Anne Marie Druskinis
10:12 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Woo hoo!!!
JAMES KLEINSCHMIDT
10:55 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Patricia,
On your house, you will probably not even pay $20, unless it is worth $200,000 or more. Your property taxes are probably at least 20% less than a few years ago. And the annual reports of corporations in which I invest indicate that executive salaries are at considerably higher levels than a half a million even for "small capitalization" corporations, as disturbing as that may be. The free admission will allow access to more art and activities than there is time in an afternoon. And we can now be hopeful that our taxpayers harbor some values that include preserving what is worthwhile, and preserving, in this case, some of the best of the art world for others.
Greg B
2:00 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
James, correction on your post. My house is now worth way more than 20% less than it was several years ago but my property taxes have still continued to increase.
Mike
3:38 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Greg, look at your annual statement from Oakland County. The reason your taxes have risen will be explained there. My guess is that your capped value that is used for calculating your tax is still lower than your SEV, hence the increases even with the declines in home prices over the past 5 years.
Greg B
4:02 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Thanks Mike, I am aware of why my taxes have continued to go up I was commenting on James post. ;-)
Ferndale_1986
11:01 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
good riddance to Craig Covey.
Jim Routhier
1:10 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
It's easy to make cheap shots when you hide behind some made up screen name. I can't help but wonder if your tune would be different had you not been able to hide your identity here.
Ferndale_1986
1:37 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
@Jim Routhier
It's not a made up screen name. I live in Ferndale, and I moved here in 1986.
Joe
11:25 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
This works out good for me, it's actually cheaper to go to the DIA than some were paying before.
But, that doesn't make it right to increase every single property tax (which shouldn't be funding this in the first place) to pay for it. The only people who vote are those who feel REALLY strongly about an issue, so of course there will be more supporters, when it's not big enough of a deal to the people who oppose it ($20 / year or so).
If every single person were forced to vote, I don't think it would've passed (not even that close actually), and that's sad. However, you can't force people to vote, so it's really the fault of the people as a whole.
Ferndale_1986
11:35 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
@Joe
spot on Joe.
there were 919,416 registered voters.
143,274 (15%) voted for the DIA tax.
1 out of every 7 people made the decision for the other 6.
Mike
11:53 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
You speak for all of those voters? I highly doubt it.
Mark
12:00 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Boy sounds like those other 6 should have gotten out and voted.
EHM
12:22 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
And most of the other 6/7 of the population probably don't have a good reason why they didn't vote.
(I woke up horribly sick that morning, good reason. I'm on a vacation that I planned months ago but never bothered to get an absentee ballot, I don't think my vote counts anyway, or I just didn't feel like voting, then don't complain!)
Art
12:23 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
This is why organizations love having millages in the summer elections. Most pass with minority choosing for the majority.
Les
11:58 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Since when do people who do not vote have a right to complain about the actions of those who did vote? Additionally why do people who DO NOT pay property taxes have a right to vote on a millage? I am talking about those who just do not ay the tax that they are supposed to pay; I am not talking about renters who pay the tax through their landlord
A Person
11:37 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Here's the link -- click on the service agreement for the details of what's going to happen: http://www.oakgov.com/boc/news/art_institute_minutes.html
Art
12:24 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I can now terminate my DIA membership. I get in free and they still get may taxes so they no longer need my membership. There is joy in Muddville/
Les
12:02 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Art, remember your DIA membership is tax deductible!
Also without your membership you will still have to pay to get intospecial events and showings, and you will lose your discount at the gift shop (and I am not just talking trinkets and toys but the ability to purchase art you may want in your home).
GpGr67
12:29 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Its unbelievable that everyone is complaining about spending $20-$30 annually to support one of the greatest cultural institutions in Michigan. Detroit is barely in the same class of places like New York, Boston, Chicago or other great cities because of their cultural institutions, but the ones we have are worth saving and protecting. Donations and other support that the DIA and other entities used to survive on have dried up in these economic times. I have to believe that 99% of those complaining fall into line with the typical anti-education, anti-thinking, no tax, Tea-party GOP ideological mentality. You'll spend more at lunch or at Starbucks this week than you will in an entire year to support the DIA through this millage.
Art
12:39 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Is you thinking so small that all you can come up with tea party speak. You have missed the principle of the subject. BTW, Detroit is not barely in the same class as the cities you mentioned. Barely is a long way away.
Joe
1:08 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
GpGr67 - "Anti-thinking"? Nice. Anyway, it wouldn't matter if is was $1, that's not the point at all. Just because attendance and donations are down, this millage literally forces 3 large counties to buy an annual membership to the DIA through their property taxes.
I have no problem with property taxes, but this is not what they are for. Adding to them to keep a business open because they can't fund-raise sufficiently and lost their government funding? This is great for those that love the DIA, but those that don't want to donate or attend, shouldn't have to. They should be able to put their money wherever they want - Starbucks included.
Leslie Curtis
5:08 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
If people are complaining about paying an extra $20-30 in taxes annually they should consider themselves useless to society. Most will spend that amount in the local bar in Macomb county buying a couple of drinks...I really don't care how much they're paying the director as long as the venue is utilized for the purpose of what it's intended for. It's a institution that should be supported by all. You never know when that trip to the museum may inspire some young person for their future growth and development.
Robert
5:13 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Leslie Curtis, I don't care that you don't care about the tax payers. I do care about American contributors and the unreasonable tax burden which people such as you take no issue putting on us. It’s not your call to determine what I do with my money. That is my business and so called citizens of the world such as you have no input.
Leslie Curtis
9:53 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Robert I'm not sure i understand your statement "People like me?" I'm a tax payer as well and I probably pay more than you however somethings in our society need to be accessible for all and this millage provides that. People complain about the crime in Detroit maybe this will expose some of those who commit those crimes to something different turning their lives around. You can't be so selfish as to worry about $20 annually because you never know it may just be the best $20 you ever spent. I don't mind because I see the good that can come from this. So Robert come on to the 21st century because in order to sustain a region someone has to pay. No it's not fair but hey, its part of life and we can afford to. At least I can.
Peter Griffin
12:14 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
it's $20 for this cause and $30 for that cause. Here, another $10, there another $15 --- where does it stop. The sun would still come up tomorrow if the DIA was closed. Peoples' lives would still go on...and Detroit would still be on the decline. We don't "need" an art "museum". How many hundreds of people visit the DIA each year compared to the millions that visit Comerica every year? I just heard that the Tigers have drawn almost 3 million this year -- what is the DIA numbers for attendance?
There are other "art" facilities in MI -- Cranbrook has a nice art gallery.....seems like they can operate on a budget. I wonder why? Aren't there galleries in the artsie/fartsie town of Ann Arbor???
CJA
12:42 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Excuse me...people should not be forced to spend an additional $20 a year to support this. What city do you live in? People are not working and are losing their homes. Let the DIA fund raise like the zoo had to. Let the fat cat making $400 k a year take a pay cut like city employees have had to do. This is crazy. If I wanted to give the DIA $20 bucks I would attend a show and pay admission. What is next??? I think we should start a petition drive to repeal this based on the stupidity of it.
JH
1:24 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
The zoo receives funding from a millage too.
Good luck with your petition....
GP For Life
1:34 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Since they're now a taxpayer supported entity you could probably get a hefty salary reduction out of them. $400k is a bit excessive. I mean, if the dude was making it rain huge corporate donations, I could understand. That is apparently not the case.
I am forced to pay for wellfare checks, medacare, social securiity, and god knows what else. These things add nothing to my life and only serve to continue a culture of entitlement which enslaves the recipients to a life of poverty. Whereas this money attempts to shine of light of culture into an otherwise black pit of ignorance. To me this is money well-spent.
CJA
12:54 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
And for the record I voted against it. 1-800 Don' t care if the DIA closes....so don' t preach that people who are whining didnt vote...and this is the DETROIT institute of Arts...when are they going to change the name to the Tri-County Institute of Arts since we are agsin forced to bail out a DETROIT facility...Do you people realize Detroit gets tax three times for every person that works there? You pay income tax if you work in Detroit...you pay to park to a lot that pays property tax to Detroit...and then not only does Detroit collect property tax ftom the building you work in...they tax the businesses for personal property that are located in that building. Maybe they should stop mismanaging funds and support their "Golden Jewel Institutions".
Jim Routhier
1:12 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Your rambling makes no sense
James
1:28 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I am really worried this vote cause Detroit to ship other burdens to us.
JH
1:36 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
The DIA is called the DIA because it's in Detroit, not because it's run by the City of Detroit. This is not a Detroit burden.
GP For Life
1:40 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
James, it's a shame but the fact is that Detroit is unable to solve many of their problems on their own. So, whether or not we want them, their burdens will soon be upon us. Honestly, it's the price we have to pay for letting illiterate masses try to self-govern.
Eric B
1:41 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I worry about the future of this. If admission is now "free," won't more people attend, which will cause operating expenses to go up? If that is the result, will the DIA be seeking an increase to this millage 2 years from now in another primary election?
Is this just a "foot in the door" for the DIA and other institutions who are suffering from decreased revenue as many businesses are in the current economic climate?
They can claim all they want that this will allow them to boost their endowment so that they can survive on the interest earned on their investments, but I would certainly be surprised if we aren't asked to increase this millage or renew it!
Peter Griffin
12:22 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
just like the book, "if you give a mouse a cookie"...
KEN
2:03 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Something is really wrong here!!! Either the voting was fixed, good chance, or the people that voted this in are idiots! Macomb county voters only make up 10 % of the dia attendance and yet it passes by 51% I doubt it. The DIA Director makes over $400,000.00 dollars yes more than the president of the U.S.A. ! a 100,000,000.00 (100 million) endowment fund! and you want to give more of your hard earned money to something you will not even use. Boy all I can say is something is really wrong with this picture. Oh one more thing I know of three different VIOLENT attacks that happened to people I know in the city of detroit this week so those of you who did vote before you visit please be prepared for the dangers.
GP For Life
2:45 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
KEN, $100 million endowment is throwing off maybe, maybe, $7 million in cash a year, and I would doubt it's that high. They're probably getting $4 to $5 million a year out of the endowment given current market conditions. You can't pay many $400k salaries with that!
walden schmidt
7:17 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
$400k a year is not excessive for a director of a museum that has the stature of the DIA. There are directors of museums that have much smaller and less significant collections that are being paid 2, 3 and 4 times that amount. If we want a top-10 art museum, it has to be run with someone with extensive experience in the arts, not a recent grad making 20k. As for the comparison between civil and political salaries, nobody gets into politics because is pays well.
Kelly Driscoll Saiyacork
12:46 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Ken, the only thing wrong that occurred with the millage is that too many eligible voters in the eligible counties didn't show up. The VOTERS always get to decide in a majority wins format. Fortunately, the all eligible voters are made aware of the millage long before the election is held. Participation by all is what is needed. I for on am very happy to have taxes decided up by those who will be paying for the tax. It is much better than a tax being forced upon the citizens by government officials. In the future, you may consider organizing transportation to the voting booth for those voters who share your point of view.
Bob Carr
2:03 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
There are a great many opinions here that would benefit greatly from facts. The Press had a great article a little while back comparing the financial structure and compensation of the DIA to comparable institutions. It also examined how the present situation came to pass. Bottom line was that the DIA was on track to closure. If you haven't read the article, by all means Google it and give it a read.
Steve Herrington
2:05 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Eric, that's the problem with Socialism all you have to look forward to are higher taxes. Next will be a seperate tax for sports stadiums, the DSO, health clubs, all for the common good.
Kelly Driscoll Saiyacork
12:41 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
The beauty of democracy is that taxes like the DIA millage are not forced on the people. The people are provided ample time & freedoms to organize before the vote to gather participation at the voting booth. Voter approved taxes are always more favorable than government mandated taxes.
John David
2:20 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
For those commenting on the DIA director's salary, here is a listing of 2010 CEO salaries of institutions, including art museum directors. The DIA didn't make the list. All those listed made more than $500,000. The source is the Orange County Register newspaper.
http://taxdollars.ocregister.com/files/2010/09/top-ceo-salaries.pdf
Rosanne Triano
10:30 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
John, Thanks for sharing that list....very interesting. As an Art teacher, I am thrilled the measure passed. The arts and creativity are so important in developing our children for an ever-changing world. We learn at the DIA how the arts have been a mode of expression for centuries.
kidcat24
2:44 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
When Wall Street sucked money out of our cities and towns (bonds) and then our Governor sucked another 1.8 billion dollars out of our cities and towns, who did you think is going to be left holding the bag?
Terry
3:11 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
How about those same cities and towns who got used to higher revenues from the housing bubble and now are fighting to preserve spending habits they can no longer afford. The public sector has a long way to go to get back to where they need to be. Private sector employees and retirees, who don't get their benefits, will continue to liose patience. The fights we have seen over the last 2 years are just the beginning. There is no silver bullet coming to boost the economy.
Voters will have to decide what they are willing to fund. In this case, they sais the DIA was a worthy cause. .
Steve Herrington
7:53 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Lets come up with some more special interest taxes so that we can do more things for "free"! We can have a concert tax because music is a good thing and use it to support the DSO, Pine Knob etc.. Then we can push for a sporting events tax because everyone likes a good game. How about a coffee tax so we can all go to Starbucks for " free"? We all need to be healthy so we can have " government funded" health clubs, the list is endless. We won't have any spendable income left but hey for the common good we can all do the things "we" want for "free" right?! Whatever happened to Capitalism where people control their own income for the things they want instead of government??
walden schmidt
10:09 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Per state law, a millage can only be used for a government entity, not a private or public business.
Kelly Driscoll Saiyacork
12:38 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Mr. Herrington, you are free to put forth new millages to your representatives as you see fit. The DIA millage passed only because the VOTERS passed the millage. Participation in democracy is always a good thing. Only the citizens of the counties which voted will receive free entry. All others will pay for their entry. Although, if you think about it, since the citizens of the millage counties are paying for the millage, it isn't free for them either. Fortunately they had a say in deciding up or down on the millage.
Eric B
8:08 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Bravo Mr. Harrington!
Eric B
6:36 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Here's the issue I take with this measure: it's a stepping stone.
The supporters can be puppets, and regurgitate their talking points all they want, "it's only $20 a year, to save a gem" but the reality is that this is most likely just the introductory rate. Making something "free" increases demand. Under normal circumstances, increased patronage at the DIA would be a good thing, however, they are now on a fixed income.
The predictable future of this measure is that the DIA will now use their newfound wealth to develop a new marketing campaign where they'll advertise their "free" admission. Patronage will increase. They will need to hire more employees to deal with the new crowds, causing a rise in operating expenses. In order to maintain their expected profit margins, they will have to begin charging for some events and services. Some people will become upset about the fees because "I'm already paying for this" they'll say. Perhaps, this will hurt patronage and some of those new employees may have to be let go, unless they're unionized. If the employees are union, or if the DIA gets enough complaints about charging for events/services, they will then consider proposing an increase to this millage to maintain their projected profit margins. They'll use scare tactics to muster support for the measure: "we need this or we'll be in breach of contract and we will have to shut the doors." Then they'll say "it's only an increase $__ a year" (on top of the original amount).
Kelly Driscoll Saiyacork
10:00 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
The best part of this victory for the DIA is it was VOTER APPROVED. Voters have the luxury of deciding issues like this one. This is a beautiful example of Democracy in Action with the Republic.
Robert
10:27 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
No, its an example of how foolish voters can be when they don't pay attention to the issues. Much the same as how we ended up with Obama. People voted with how they feel, and not with their heads.
Haulin T Male
10:50 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
a victory? I was last there in the 50's, I dare you to tell me I don't have Culture, I raised 5 kids all professionals, 1 is a PGA pro, 1 saves breast for Susan G koman, boston. Not once did a painting put any food on our table, etc, saying a victory of what 100k voters, out of an area of 3 million (?) if people were that interested, the DIA would not be begging, I would think. what is the victory, I say it is the dangerous precedence it sets , people voting for some thing that only told you what they wanted to sound needy, now the next Regional Vote will be, to help0 tear down the homes in Det.? this is scary, never has so few dedicated people tell the rest what they will like, using 4 letters, free , well grand pappy always said, nothing of quality in life is free....... this $20 could be 40 in 10 yr's ........
Peter Griffin
12:26 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
@ Kelly ----- I am going to be sick....
Peter Griffin
12:29 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
@ Haulin --- nice. You are exactly right. No painting has ever put food in my household either. Congrats on raising some successful kids.
Kelly Driscoll Saiyacork
12:52 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
4 x 4 driver, I am sorry you are not feeling well. Perhaps the next election will go your way. Please gather up as many eligible voters & help them get to the voting booth. It is a lack of participation by those who didn't vote (not suggesting you) and not those who did vote that brought about this millage. A millage to help fund those who are hungry would be a wonderful thing for you to bring to the next election. I am very happy that this was a Voter Approved millage approval & not a government mandated millage approval. Democracy in Action works best when everyone (not just you & me) participate.
Haulin T Male
3:35 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
I am not bragging about my 5 kids, this whole journey was not done or manage by the Silver Spoons, I punched the clock most of my 31 yr's at the same place, they went to H S at 2 very well known girls school, & the boys went right next door to their school, I was tuition poor, but that kept them all under guidance, while Dad was 24 miles away, working, there was no tri county bail out. there 45, 43, 40, 34, & 27 now...... a lot of corners were cut, by getting into and surviving the competition, in the hall ways, every where, as for the only daughter, I saw some of her classmates cause how dare her teacher deduct 0.015 from her over all score...... Give me a break, your GPA only matters to the college your appl. to, wait a year, reapply and they done care if you were all "B's ............. so a lot of less stressful ways to do the same thing
Mark
3:40 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
I wish I could understand your last post Haulin'. It seemed interesting.
Haulin T Male
10:57 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Is this the last yr. for any School or side bar requests, on primary voting day?
Scxhools etc. can only hold elections etc. in November, The State is saying it will no longer under write the cost for these lets do a vte when People are gone and or don't vote, it will only be when the greater % of people do vote.........I sat on school boards, where the first statement, no we don't want it in Nov. we need to do it in March, or Aug. it cost this city 8,000 for every election, (vote) out of the general fund.
Haulin T Male
11:18 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Please don't try to patronize me, by telling me don't take my G Kids to a water park, or by dinner, or even compare it to any thing I privately do, those I fought for, and are my decisions, just quit with the "Invincible" attitude, are you that desperate for you to attach your self to such a low rung vote result. O do mot get led by "FREE" still wont go , the best museum I have ever been to is "London's" with the Rosetta stone out in the open just inches from you, your breath could be seen on it, it was free, cause it was the peoples there was a spot for donations as one left, but not mandatory.
Les
12:09 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
The Thinker by Rodin is also free at the DIA ---right outside the front door and you do not even have to travel to Londo to see it
Haulin T Male
11:21 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Basically I say, for all that voted for it, should be the ones to subsidize it, don't yell at people who are now force to help you do what you like, now You owe me one.
Kelly Driscoll Saiyacork
12:32 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Nope. They don't owe you a thing. They followed the rules agreed up within our democracy. They came to the voting booth and placed 1 vote either up or down for the millage. They even gave you (if you are a resident of the counties which are now subsidizing the DIA) the opportunity to vote too. Not only that, they campaigned with their position. This gave you the opportunity to gather up voters who share your position to vote against. Oh, and for the record, all the folks who voted for the millage are indeed subsidizing it. After all, that is what the final outcome decided. It is great to live in a democracy.
Robert
12:50 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Kelly, unfortunately not all of the voters will subsidize it. The majority of residents in the city of Detroit rent, and do not pay property taxes. Now I realize that they do pay a small portion of the tax in their monthly rent, but it’s not anywhere near what an actual home owner pays. In fact many the rental fees are locked for prolonged periods and section-eight housing is even further locked. So in essence this tax has the same effect as school mileages passed in areas where there are there are high concentrations of apartments. The burden falls on those who actually own property.
Kelly Driscoll Saiyacork
2:59 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
It is true that the property taxes are being used, as outlined in the millage that the citizens were able to vote down. Fortunately for all who own their own homes, the property owners of rental properties (including those which house businesses) will also be subject to the millage. Fortunately for the rental property owner, they are allowed to raise the rent as per the rental contract. Again, this is another great thing about a millage voted up by the voters. Home Owners, Renters & Property Owners alike all get to cast 1 vote.
Haulin T Male
3:45 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Kelly you make it sound like every one voted, ( less then 10%) so the will of the people does not holdm just a selfish few, who gloat, for making others may for your habit. , I do not care about the texture of the paint, canvas, or firmness of brush strokes........ etc ... any more then you do such quality time spent it pit row, or restoring a classic.......... the DIA never won any war, etc..... enjoy, this is what happens when there was no funding the opposition... if I was a politician, I would of snuck some thing through of over all value, cause it won't happen again
EHM
5:10 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
I think you should be more concerned with the (using your figure) 90% who didn't vote rather than those who did but don't agree with you.
Yes, 10% is not necessarily the "will of the people" but if that many are willing to leave it up to the other 10%...
Eric B
12:14 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
I enjoy the shooting range. Shall we propose a millage to make range time & ammunition free at the local firearms ranges? If we can get it to pass, I'm sure the supporters here will remain silent because, after all, it would be the will of the voters.
Kelly Driscoll Saiyacork
12:34 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
If you are a citizen, you are more than welcome to propose such a millage. That is the beauty of democracy. You have the power to organize other of like mind to change our laws.
Robert
12:53 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
I'm sure that Eric B would be accused of being a gun toting maniac by several grass roots groups and any attempt to put fourth such a petition would be considered paramount to a threat to overthrow the government.
Kelly Driscoll Saiyacork
2:55 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Robert, no one ever said that it would be easy to put a millage on a ballot & then get it passed. Due to the first amendment, opponents due get to label one another. Although childish, this is a fact of politics (one we could all do without in my opinion). On the bring side, the labeling of Eric B for his proposed millage would not disqualify him from bringing the millage to the ballot. That is the beauty of our democracy. Yes, it requires the courage to stand up to name calling & labeling.
Kelly Driscoll Saiyacork
12:29 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Again, The best part of this victory for the DIA is it was VOTER APPROVED. Voters have the luxury of deciding issues like this one. This is a beautiful example of Democracy in Action within the Republic of the United States of America. If one was truly opposed to this millage, then one should have done more to get eligible voters to the voting booth. It is VOTER APPROVED. That is the beauty of a democracy. We are able to say Yes or No to millage proposals. It is great to live in a democracy.
lala ts
2:06 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
VOTERS who RENT, do not have to pay for the milage increase, yet they can now visit the DIA for free?
They should have increase ticket prices.
Kelly Driscoll Saiyacork
2:51 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
lala ts, Yes renters who live in the 3 eligible counties are able to enter the DIA for free. Please remember this was a millage that was voted on by the residents of those counties. All voters who were opposed to the millage had ample opportunity to help one another get to the voting booth to put down the millage. As the millage passed with so very few people voting at all, it seems the majority of eligible voters really were ok with renters attending the DIA for free. After all, their landlord pays the property tax where they live. This is the beauty of living in a democracy. Those who care about the issues (pro or against) get to decide by voting. It is wonderful that we are also free to speak to one another before the election to encourage others of like mind to do the same.
Eric B
12:58 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
What I find most distressing is the number of people out there who believe they have a right to a portion of the fruits of my labor.
Halotron
1:07 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
So glad this passed! :)
kidcat24
1:17 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
If you think income inequality is good for consumerism, think again. If the minimum wage had kept pace with the rise in executive salaries since 1990, America's poorest paid workers would be making more than $23 an hour. There are no unskilled workers!
Eric B
1:24 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
That doesn't sound communist.....
kidcat24
1:49 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Yes so communist that a workers wage keeps up with inflation. Real communist. Now what is that called when the people at the top have all the money?
Kevin Karwowicz
1:42 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
What a SHAME. Imagine this, Men and Women whom sacrificed for our country, receive care in our county, supported by taxpayers of county, Money stays in county to HELP our soldiers of our County. Will receive under $1 million for there care, while the 7 members of the DIA combined yearly salary is more then ALL the veterans.
Remember to THANK the Voters of St Clair Shores, Sterling Heights, Centerline, Mt Clemens, for overwhelmingly passing it in their communities. Because I WILL NOT spend one dollar ever again in those communities.
Good Times
kidcat24
1:59 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
The Veterans Millage that was approved will raise 1 million a year for 6 years.
kidcat24
2:02 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
To say that our veterans are more important than art I agree. But who puts that high value on art?
lala ts
2:05 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
What I hate is that non-property owners get to vote on the matter.. renters who voted pass the cost on to homeowners, yet they reap the rewards. They should have just raised ticket prices.
kidcat24
2:09 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
I've heard that renters sometimes get the property tax passed on to them.
lala ts
2:15 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
kidcat, I've rented for 20 years, in 10 different michigan cities. I've never heard of your rent changing mid contact because of millage increase.
Mark
2:27 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Probably not Lala but you can believe that as an owner's expenses go up so will the rent come contract renewal.
GP For Life
3:19 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Constitutionality aside, I have never seen ignorance like I have seen in this thread. Your worried about non-property owners voting and I am concerned about people like you voting. You and your ilk cannot grasp the simplest of concepts as it relates to how cost increases flow to the consumer. You probably think the tax rate on corporations should be 90% so consumers don't have to pay taxes. Disturbing.
lala ts
2:24 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Actually I think this is kind of funny, and the DIA is going to regret this in the long run. People who are poor, enjoy free things. What is going to happen when the DIA is filled to the brim with inner city rowdy Detroit kids?
Haulin T Male
4:00 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
charge admissions.............. start putting in parameters, racial profiling
kidcat24
2:35 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Well, I guess there will always be those that stereotype.
Haulin T Male
4:05 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
I am watching the women soccer, so if it doesn't make sense tell me which one there are 100 posts .....lol
Haulin T Male
5:16 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Kidc what does inner city kids mean to you, just answered like it was said.....
Haulin T Male
5:21 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
when I had 4 homes renting, I didn't pass on every increase, every ticky tacky one, did do a COLA every other year.......... some things you just eat, to keep tenants, who are paying and on time. so I do know that a lot of renters do not pay taxes, where they have a sense what things cost... as home owner does, when he is maxed.