.
Feedback

Car Cruise May be Unable to Rescue K-9 Unit

Chesterfield Township Supervisor Michael Lovelock cautions residents the township board may not approve reinstatement of K-9 Unit.

Although for the K-9 unit in Chesterfield Township, community officials can't guarantee the unit's existence.

"The cruise is great for the people of Chesterfield," township Supervisor Michael Lovelock said Wednesday. "But, I just don't want to see people thinking this money is going to go to the K-9 unit until the board makes that decision."

Lovelock and police Chief Bruce Smith have said the Board of Trustees told cruise organizers that there were once the last police dog retires in the near future.

However, North Gratiot Cruise Chairman John Vecchio said Monday the cruise foundation aims to donate proceeds from the Aug. 26 event to the township and Macomb County Sheriff's Office K-9 units.

"Our mission is really to keep the K-9 unit alive in Chesterfield," Vecchio said.

It would take about $50,000 to buy a new dog, train the animal and get a new K-9 vehicle. After that, about $15,000 would be needed annually to maintain the unit, according to Vecchio and township police.

Event organizers acknowledge it would take multiple cruises to raise enough money to support and sustain the township K-9 unit.

"Would it be the difference to put a patrolman on the road or a dog on the road?" Lovelock questioned.

"Dogs are great but it's a costly maneuver to put a dog on the road...Unless they come up with an endowment to pay for that, there's no way the township can afford to do that," he said.

He emphasized that the township board and police chief would ultimately have the final say on the unit, based on finances.

In early 2011, . That leaves longtime police dog Bulzi, a German Shepherd trained in narcotic detection, as the sole remaining canine in the department.

"We're going to use the dog until he can no longer work," Lt. Charles Verschaeve . "We don't know how long that will be."

What do you think township officials should do about the K-9 Unit?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New Baltimore-Chesterfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Tracy - Chesterfield Twp April 5, 2012 at 01:07 pm
The level of narcotics in Chesterfield has tripled since we moved here in 2000. I understand Lovelock's position, but WOULD he hire another police officer?
Our police force is down to a skeleton crew as other police departments are in Macomb County, but the questions remains if not a police dog......how about another officer? Thinking about it from a business standpoint, a police dog would be more economically feasible in a long run since that's there monetary stance. I fully commend Vecchio for looking out for our community!!! And what it sounds like is that Lovelock and Smith are looking for an agreement for the proceeds to be dedicated back to K-9 every year in order for this to work. I'm for whatever it takes to keep our police force strong. There have been numerous break in's on our street alone. I know that some are opposed to a millage increase, but maybe that's the route to also take. It would be pennies a day.
Dave April 5, 2012 at 02:18 pm
@Tracy.. Where are these narcotics located? Are you saying the dog isn't cost effective? I would think that would be just the thing Bulzi was trained to do. Maybe the reason is because he's already getting old and they haven't thought to train a replacement puppy that could do both narcotics and explosives. I don't know why they couldn't get grants from other agencys to do the training..
But this doesn't sound like Bulzi should retire just yet. A dog can do other things a human officer can't. Like chase a suspect.. think of the different outcome that florida case would of been if Zimmerman had a dog instead of a gun. The dog i'm sure is trained to find suspects from their smell, a human can't smell explosives or guns or drugs. I'd suggest they not only keep Bulzi but get a new dog to replace Chaos and train either one or two dogs to replace Bulzi. Wouldn't anyone think it would be more cost effective to have more than one dog but instead of getting a new vehicle for each one have the same driver? I'd like to see it run more cost effectively but if i were lovelock i'd not only vote to continue the program i'd like to see it expanded where they take the dog Bulzi and have him start training with a new puppy or two. Just my opinion though. I could see more funding sources thru grants for a dog or training of one than i could for just another officer. I'd look into that first before deciding to drop it. Just My opinion though.
Bob April 5, 2012 at 02:43 pm
It seems to me the cost to keep a dog program has been grossly overinflated. $15,000 a year to take care of a dog? I own 3 dogs and it doesn't cost anything near that....maybe they accidentally added a zero to the end. As far as a car goes, I would think that even without a dog, the officer would still need a car to drive, or does the person that had the dog have to start walking when the dog retires?
I think the Gratiot Cruise is a great resource for the police department, however, if the board is not willing to step up and commit to continuing the dogs regardless of how much money the Cruise provides, then I think the Cruise should consider giving the money to an agency that is willing to find ways to keep its resources, regardless of outside donations! If the money is donated after the dog is gone, where is the donated money going to go and who will be responsible for making sure it is not spent outside of its purpose?
Dave April 5, 2012 at 03:38 pm
Seems to me they need a better proposal with better accounting and projected costs too bob. I'd like to see what the program consists of now.. what the current costs are compared to what the benefits have been for the past how ever long they've been using Bulzi. Has it been worth his upkeep for the number of cases he's helped solve?
I still say there are other benefits for having a dog over an officer. That they're not comparing apples to apples. A dog has abilities humans don't. Even with glow in the dark cameras to see hot footprints. A dog can smell a humans scent on a dollar bill... it can smell cocaine and meth on dollar bills too. Those type of users usually roll up dollar bills to snort their drugs. They have to spend that money at places and only a dog can smell both the drugs and those who have touched that money. You wouldn't see an officer tracking down a lost child using just an old hairbrush or piece of clothing would you? A dog can smell a lost child's scent even weeks afterwards. Those high tech cameras can't do that either. You could take a dog to those locations Tracy was mentioning about breakins and a dog should be able to track a suspect or at least let someone know where the suspect was or which direction they came from. There's alot a dog can do that a human can't.. that's why i'd argue to keep the program. Not because it wasn't cost effective. They should be looking at ways to improve it and streamline costs if you asked me.
Bill T. April 5, 2012 at 05:25 pm
I think the K-9 unit should continue. It has been a useful tool available to officers and the public on many occasions through the years. If the public were aware of the stats behind those years of service for both dogs, I'm sure they along with the Township Board would see the benefits to the community and the department. It would be nice to see a breakdown of the costs involved and turn to the officers who are handlers of the dogs for ideas on how to cut some of the expense. As far as a new vehicle, I believe the department has three or four SUV's in the fleet that I'm sure using one and outfitting it for the K-9 Unit would be more than fitting. The one K-9 unit still in operation is still using the same vehicle for the last nine years. I plead with the Township Board not to remove another critical and useful tool from our dwindling police department. We are already undermanned with officers but that is another topic in itself.
Bob April 5, 2012 at 08:06 pm
After watching a concerned citizen ask questions about the current cost of the program and what other resources have been looked at for cuts, it seems that the board members don't know the answers to that Dave. I am curious if this citizen took his questions the the police Chief as the Twp. Supervisor suggests? There is also a suggestion that officers are willing to take cuts in compensation to help save the unit, I am curious if this has been implemented and what savings that would incur. I can not see any reason an employee would not be allowed to take a cut in pay!
Heres a link to the meeting: http://events.powerstream.net/002/00330/ParentInt/dynasx.asp?spd=225&clp=&contID=ChesterfieldTwpBoardMeeting111121
Dave April 5, 2012 at 08:17 pm
@bob.. Seems to me that a review should be in order before making any decisions. I don't know so much as if it is the board's lack of information or that the program really isn't cost effective. If they are making arrests where they used the dog(s) i would think it would be possible to look at the fines after conviction involved versus the expenses for feeding and keeping the dog. Weigh the cost of the current program against what it cost to keep that one dog and then see if it wouldn't be more sensible to have two or even three dogs with the same training; or as they want to do get rid of the unit. If it were just a matter of detecting explosives we can train bees to do that. And at alot less cost. And then if they are going to get rid of the dogs then i'd have to ask what they were going to do to fill the gap with what they can do now and what they won't be able to do without this unit.
Are there crimes which either Bulzi or Chaos were instrumental? For all i know they've already solved or helped out in at least one case in which the expense for the whole year was worth it. I'd like to see Bulzi 's record and see his handler make the case to the city council as to why the program should continue.
Alex April 5, 2012 at 11:50 pm
My thoughts on the townships position of the K-9 unit. I found the $50,000 figure astounding so on with my search for some credible information. A fully trained K-9 can run between $5,000.00 and $12,000.00 with a dual purpose dog reaching the more expensive side. Granted there will also be costs involved with the officer needing time to be trained with that dog but I am sure this can be done on straight time rather than the overtime. To say a new vehicle is needed for this dog is just double talk in my opinion. Regardless if an officer has a dog or not he/she still needs a vehicle to patrol so this is a wash or in this case maybe just a wish. As far as the benefits of K-9 please read for yourself a study done by Officer Marie Wolfe of the Lansing Police Department K-9 Unit. This can be found at www.uspcak9.com/training/WolfeBuildingStudy.pdf.
This way you may come to your own conclusion in realizing the importance of this topic. It sure seems to me that the K-9 was sacrificed for all the wrong reasons as past headlines informed us $146,000.00 is now being spent on renovations in the police departments building and to top it off we offered Michigan State Police free rent as they lost their post in Richmond. You would think that organization would be capable of helping the township out with some sort of costs to keep our dogs. Then again maybe there was hopes in the beginning but we are once again reminded there are no guarantees.
John Peters April 6, 2012 at 01:53 pm
There isno more cost-effective tool in law enforcement than the K9. It is a force extender, meaning the dog can compensate for human coverage precisely at a time when tightening budgets are reducing the number of human officers available to police the community. K9's do not get paid salaries, do not get benefits and do not have a retirement fund. When properly trained and utilized they more than pay for themselves. On drug forfetitures alone, these skilled animals can actually produce revenue for the Township in the tens of thousands of dollars. If one canine, locates and saves the life of one infant or one elderly person who has wandered off and is in danger - how do you put a price on that life saved? The comments make it clear that the people of Chesterfield understand the value of the K9 unit and want it preserved. Why are its elected representatives so determined to thwart the democratic process?
John Peters April 6, 2012 at 01:59 pm
A postscript to my earlier comment. It is not a avalid argument that K9 will cost the Township money, All law enforcement tools will cost money. How much does the Chief spend on SWAT - a tool which is almost never needed? How much is the Chief costing the Township in salary and benefits? Cost is only one side of any balance sheet. You must also evaluate the return on that cost. In that cost/benefit analysis, I would place K9 up against any other aspect of the department, including the Chief.
Bob April 6, 2012 at 05:02 pm
Great points John. In a normal business one must look at the cost to produce something vs. the profit. Government is not in business to make money, they are in business to provide services. One would think that any good administrator would weigh out the fiscal cost of having a resource against the cost in loss of services. Alex also brings up a good point about the 146K approved for MORE building renovations. Didn't this board just approve $80K in renovations at the end of last year? For being so concerned about money they seem to spend a lot of money on a building.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Audrey Tatarelli June 1, 2013 at 06:20 pm
chickens are a food source,as long as there is not a rooster making noise all the time. They areRead More not a
Audrey Tatarelli June 1, 2013 at 06:24 pm
a problem like loud stereos all day all night, people selling cars etc on their front lawn, homesRead More not being kept check out the house on Sugarbush 2 years a ladder on the roof and the schrubs and grass is over grown. I thought we paid some one to look out for things as stated. I want a refund.
Michelle Carpenter Valenti June 5, 2013 at 01:43 pm
Ridiculous!! If they are going to do that then Chesterfield needs to think about bringing in aRead More decent market, like Whole Foods. There is no where in this area to get decent healthy food!!!