STACKED DECK- House of Hidden Cards Part 2

Four bills proposing changes to the MMA were passed in the Judiciary Committee, but questionable proceedings allowed less than 24 hours for the medical marijuana community to prepare.

I am on several email groupings, tools of activism that give instant communication to the state’s cannabis reform leadership, who then take the information and pass the message along.

We knew, from the Michigan.gov, that the House Judiciary Committee was going to meet on the 29th to take up the question of the package of bills aimed at changing the Medical Marijuana Act (MMA). What we didn’t know was the nature and subject of the meeting, or that they would be voting on the bills.

Last night, after 5 p.m., Chairman John Walsh sent out an email to the Judiciary Committee members and interested parties containing the proposed changes to the bills, which were passed in a Committee meeting that began today at 8:30 a.m.

Is this the best we can do? Are these actions in the best interest of the people?

The lack of advance notice is reprehensible. The Committee has heard enough from the public, apparently, and required that any additional input from the citizens, the voters, the people who sign their paychecks, be delivered in writing.

Thirty copies delivered by 8:30 a.m. or your words are ignored. There are no oral
presentations from citizens on the House floor. How does one prepare a written response to changes in these bills when those changes are announced less than 24 hours before the meeting? Citizens of Livonia, this is how Walsh, the man you chose to represent you, conducts business.

What of the Committee members, whose vote was recorded
today? They have three bills to evaluate, to read and understand and cast their vote on, with very little time to evaluate or to seek advice. The proposed
changes were not published, not on the Internet, they were not made available to
the general public unless they showed up in Lansing at 8:30 a.m. and read the printed versions.

The Internet source is on a special mailing list not available to the public and properly shared this information with the compassionate community. Is
it good government, is good law being created, when the veil of secrecy is
cloaked about the proceedings in this way? Expedience at the expense of
transparency is contradictory to the Constitution.  

Those changes that were adopted today -- are they the result of input from citizens or are they further manipulations of the House by special interest groups? When at last the House heard from patients and concerned citizens, there were nine issues wrapped up in three bills, and only three of those issues would make it
easier for patients to register and survive in Michigan. Of those three, only
one remains in a positive form in the bills passed today.

The Prosecuting Attorneys have more power than the people in our state. One of the proposed changes, which every patient and advocate who testified
in the House agreed with and supported, was to force the court system to allow
juries to hear the medical marijuana defense in Section 8 cases. That has been
altered to reflect language submitted by the ACLU; resistance from the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan will make it difficult to receive the ¾ majority vote required to change the MMA unless they give a nod of approval. Voter approved, Prosecutor rejected. Special interests win.

Placing photographs on the ID cards for patients and caregivers received a mostly favorable response from the people during the time we were allowed to give testimony. The ease with which the Secretary of State could transfer an image from their department to LARA for purposes of creating valid cards is real and was detailed in previous testimony. The new version of HB 4834 requires patients and caregivers to provide two copies of their photo, on their own, with no help from your driver’s license. Why two copies?

One for the card and one for their records. Patients might provide a picture
without the proper size, or dimensions, or that features a hat or sunglasses.
Each of these issues will cause the application to be rejected and impede the
registration process, which is the real goal here. Make it difficult for people
to get cards and they’ll stop registering, which again services the special
interest groups demanding a reduction in the number of enrollees in the MMA.

Making the program a mandatory two-year registration is a good
thing- it gives sick people less hassle and their medical condition isn’t
likely to change in 2 years. HB 4834 creates the 2 year registration system but
does not prevent LARA from doubling the fees. Sick people on a fixed disability
income are having trouble meeting the $100 annual requirement for maintaining
your MMA status; if LARA doubles the fees, which they WILL do as soon as they
can get away with it, the MMA will be too pricey for the people it was designed
to protect. Another move designed to reduce the number of registrants in the

The House bills raise new issues, too, including one that would
force LARA to hear testimony for adding new ailments to the list of qualifying
conditions - despite Sen. Rick Jones’ attempt to remove glaucoma from it. Read my blog next week and the remaining changes proposed by these bills will be examined. For links to the complete text of the Committee-approved House bills, visit:www.cannamiracles.com/Useful-Links-4-everyone----.html

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Rick Thompson March 29, 2012 at 06:14 PM
For more information on the bills, please read my previous blog House of Hidden Cards. http://newbaltimore.patch.com/blog_posts/house-of-hidden-cards-4-equals-9
Rick Thompson March 29, 2012 at 06:22 PM
A video of today's proceeding can be found here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wk5k4TRxXQ
Dave March 30, 2012 at 01:24 AM
That's alot of info to take in.. i'll have to absorb it all and get back with a comment afterwards. You wouldn't happen to know when the Michigan Supreme court is going to hear the case against the Mt Pleasant club over the issue of patient to patient sales would you? I know it's scheduled to be heard. just don't have a date.
Dave March 30, 2012 at 03:51 AM
Ok. I'm still not quite finished researching what you've written and linked to so far. But, i did get thru these two articles and watched the Utube video of the House meeting. So far nothing really jumps out at me as something i should be really alarmed about. ID pictures, transporting and doctor patient relationship i can deal with. My opinion on this info so far is probably not what anyone here would like to hear. I haven't read the pdf's yet though. And that i'm sure will clarify alot. I can't read em right now cause they really mess up my computer..my reader program itself uses up all my computer memory. It's something i'll have to fix before i can read those or i will try to find the text versions of the bills myself soon. As of right now though.. and on the subject of sales thru dispensaries being illegal, i am leaning towards the opinion that the law clearly doesn't allow for them the way they are set up. But those I've never liked anyways.The system they have in Calif. I mean, and now the copying of that system in this state. To me the owners of those seem like opportunists who just want to make all the money drug dealers do, and do it within the protection of the law. But, unless or untill they can come up with a better system of supplying MMJ i'd have to say they are at least better than nothing. Even if it does appear that they are a public nuisance according to the laws. The Mich. Supreme court should clear that up one way or another for me.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »